Cephalometric Changes following
Simultaneous First and Second Maxillary Molar Distalization
Using a Non-Compliance Intraoral Appliance

Papadopoulos, Moschos A.; Mavropoulos, Anestis; Karamouzos, Andreas

doi:10.1007/s00056-004-0317-z

Cited by 38 publications

(56 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The articles that contained relevant and sufficient data for this study were further narrowed down to 13 ( Table 1) by application of the inclusion criteria (Figure 1). [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] The results described below are summarized in Table 2 …”

Section: Results Of Searchmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Maxillary Molar Distalization with Noncompliance Intramaxillary Appliances in Class II Malocclusion

Antonarakis

Kiliaridis

2008

The Angle Orthodontist

103

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To use published data to evaluate quantitatively the dental effects of noncompliance intramaxillary appliances in individuals with Class II malocclusion. Materials and Methods: A literature search was carried out identifing 13 prospective or retrospective clinical studies matching inclusion criteria. Only appliances with conventional anchorage designs were considered for the review. The data provided in these publications were grouped and analyzed in terms of molar distalization, tipping and vertical movements, and incisor and premolar mesialization, tipping, and vertical movements. Results: Maxillary first molars showed distal crown movement and tipping greater than the mesial crown movement and tipping shown by incisors and premolars. Vertical movements of incisors and premolars were in general extrusive, but molars were intrusive or extrusive, depending on the study and the type of appliance used. Appliances that acted palatally seemed to display a smaller distal tipping movement, as well as smaller incisor and premolar mesial tipping movements, when compared with those that acted buccally. Friction-free appliances, namely the pendulum, produced a large amount of mesiodistal movement and tipping, if no therapeutic uprighting activation was applied. Conclusions: Noncompliance intramaxillary molar distalization appliances all act by distalizing molars with a concomitant and unavoidable loss of anchorage, as revealed by incisor and premolar mesial movement. Buccal acting and palatal acting appliances demonstrate almost similar results, with palatal acting appliances showing less tipping. Friction-free palatal acting appliances appear to produce better molar distalizing effects, but with a concomitant notable loss of anchorage.

show abstract

Section: Results Of Searchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Vertical movements can be measured with ANS-PNS 17 or the HP 19 as the reference point. Apart from the reference point, different points on the tooth itself such as the incisal edge, 10 the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), 16 or the centroid 18 and others can be used for measurements.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maxillary Molar Distalization with Noncompliance Intramaxillary Appliances in Class II Malocclusion

Antonarakis

Kiliaridis

2008

The Angle Orthodontist

103

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As absolute anchorage cannot be obtained by any of these anchorage systems. Skeletal anchorage is playing an increasing role in the correction of Class II malocclusions both as direct anchorage by means of mini-plates or mini-implants [19][20][21][22][23] and as indirect anchorage by means of palatal implants 24 or onplants. 25 An appliance that has received only limited attention is, however, the maxillary lip bumper.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Early Treatment with a Maxillary Lip Bumper-Bite Plateau Combination

Korn

Melsen

2008

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate the intra-arch displacements of the molars and the change in molar relationship following the use of a maxillary lip bumper combined with a bite plate. Materials and Methods: The material comprised study casts taken before and after the treatment of 40 consecutive patients with mixed dentition. The sagittal and transversal displacements were evaluated by a three-dimensional digitizer using the palatal rugae as an indirect fixed reference. The displacements were expressed as translation mesiodistally and buccolingually and rotation around the long axis and tipping mesiodistally. The change in molar relationship was measured to the nearest millimeter at the level of the occlusal plane. Results: The tooth movements were predominantly of distal rotation (mean, 9.7Њ; range, 6.5Њ to 26Њ) and distal tipping (mean, 5Њ; range, 5.8Њ to 18Њ). The distal displacement was a modest mean (mean, 0.3 mm; SD, 1.6 mm) and more pronounced to the buccal (mean 1.6 mm; SD, 1.5 mm). The molar relationship improved in all but four sites, and a full Class I was obtained in 65 of 80 sites. Conclusions:The early treatment with the lip bumper and bite plate can be recommended from a cost-benefit point of view.

show abstract

“…Vermeidung der reaktiven Eff ekte auf den mesialen Zahnbestand publiAbb. 13 Fernrönt-genseitenbild nach Abschluss der Retention.…”

Section: Intraoraler Statusunclassified

Molarendistalisation mit dem skelettal verankerten Pendulum K

Hourfar

Ludwig

Wilhelmy

et al. 2013

Inf Orthod Kieferorthop

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Cephalometric Changes following Simultaneous First and Second Maxillary Molar Distalization Using a Non-Compliance Intraoral Appliance

Cited by 38 publications

References 35 publications

Maxillary Molar Distalization with Noncompliance Intramaxillary Appliances in Class II Malocclusion

Maxillary Molar Distalization with Noncompliance Intramaxillary Appliances in Class II Malocclusion

Early Treatment with a Maxillary Lip Bumper-Bite Plateau Combination

Molarendistalisation mit dem skelettal verankerten Pendulum K

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About