2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cephalomedullary nails in the management of ipsilateral neck and shaft fractures of the femur—One or two femoral neck screws?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6,8,12,13,32 Like standard proximal locking screws, reconstruction locking screws are inserted using a radiolucent guide attached to the proximal nail; therefore, the technical difficulty of the nailing is not dramatically different. Currently, several, but not all, newer femoral nails are designed for reconstruction nailing using both trochanteric and piriformis starting points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6,8,12,13,32 Like standard proximal locking screws, reconstruction locking screws are inserted using a radiolucent guide attached to the proximal nail; therefore, the technical difficulty of the nailing is not dramatically different. Currently, several, but not all, newer femoral nails are designed for reconstruction nailing using both trochanteric and piriformis starting points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These 2 cost effectiveness can be analyzed and the difference between them is the ICER (difference in costs by the difference in effectiveness). Probability of femoral neck fracture complications 0.200 0.00 0.50 1-6, 9, 12, 13, 16-20 Probability of reconstruction nail complications 0.010 0.00 0.02 16,22 Probability of death from femur fracture 0.035 0.00 0.10 21 Probability of missed femoral neck fracture 0.370 0.00 0.60 1-6, 9, 12, 13, 16-20 Probability of ipsilateral hip fracture 0.068 0.00 0.20 1-6, 9, 12, 13, 16-20 Utilities Reconstruction nail 0.969 0.800 1.000 16,27 Reconstruction nail complications 0.820 0.500 1.000 12,16,27 Complications such as a revision of an endoprosthesis. The authors assumed that the morbidity associated with the above major complications would be a disutility of 0.3 or 24 weeks at 0.5 QALY.…”
Section: Event Utilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though recent literature shows favourable results with the use of a single implant i.e., reconstruction type of intramedullary nail, we are of the opinion that treating these combination of fractures with two separate devices (plate-screw combinations) does have a role. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] In this study we compared the outcome of ipsilateral hip and shaft femur fractures treated with reconstruction-type intramedullary nailing and various plate combinations on the fracture healing and functional outcome in patients. Very few authors have compared these two methods of fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]  Various plate-screw combinations-including a dynamic hip screw (DHS) and long side plate combination, a hip screw with a short side plate for the neck and separate plate for the shaft or cancellous screws for femoral neck and a plate for the shaft. 13,14,16  Retrograde intramedullary nail of the shaft and screw fixation of the neck.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%