2015
DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cephalic Vein and Radial Artery Diameter in Formation of Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula: A Systematic Review

Abstract: The current literature suggests that the optimal range of radial artery for maximum performance (maturation and primary patency) of RCAVF is at least 2 mm (level 2, grade a). The cephalic vein diameter of at least 2 mm (non-augmented) can result in best maturation and primary patency outcomes (level 2, grade a) and threshold below 1.5 mm is not advocated (level 2, grade b).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings appear to complement a systematic review published earlier by the authors suggesting that cephalic vein and radial artery diameter of < 1.5 mm should not be attempted as it is associated with significant primary FM failure and diameters higher than this value are highly recommended. 9 However, the lack of meta-analysis and failure to identify the best possible range for both vessels (stepwise regression) and lack of consideration of other variables (patient demographics, laterality, anaesthesia type, comorbidities) because of inconsistency of the included studies in that study created the platform for the present study. 9 Functional maturation of 66% appears to be consistent and perhaps better than some earlier reports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings appear to complement a systematic review published earlier by the authors suggesting that cephalic vein and radial artery diameter of < 1.5 mm should not be attempted as it is associated with significant primary FM failure and diameters higher than this value are highly recommended. 9 However, the lack of meta-analysis and failure to identify the best possible range for both vessels (stepwise regression) and lack of consideration of other variables (patient demographics, laterality, anaesthesia type, comorbidities) because of inconsistency of the included studies in that study created the platform for the present study. 9 Functional maturation of 66% appears to be consistent and perhaps better than some earlier reports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 However, the lack of meta-analysis and failure to identify the best possible range for both vessels (stepwise regression) and lack of consideration of other variables (patient demographics, laterality, anaesthesia type, comorbidities) because of inconsistency of the included studies in that study created the platform for the present study. 9 Functional maturation of 66% appears to be consistent and perhaps better than some earlier reports. 6,12 However, it appears once an appropriate size of radial artery (1.6 mm) and cephalic vein (1.5 mm) has been selected, up to 86e91% FM can be anticipated irrespective of other variables if all pre-operative planning and guidelines are judiciously adhered to.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the diameters of the artery and vein were not assessed; however, our hospital creates AVF when the diameters of the artery and vein are more than 1.5 to 2 mm with mapping by ultrasonography [7,8]. As this study is from a single center, there seems to be little variability of the diameter of the artery and vein used for VA creation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters of blood vessels are adopted from literature. [1,5,6,8]. Parameters of cephalic vein are supposed as for normal vein in both simulated cases, which corresponds with the situation shortly after operational creation of AVF.…”
Section: A Pressure and Flow In Time Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%