2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CEO stock option pay and R&D spending: a behavioral agency explanation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
83
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For managerial incentives Wu and Tu (2007) using Computstat data for large research intensive firms find that CEOs high powered compensation can increase R&D under high growth or with high slack, but that does not extend to other types of incentive pay. This limited result is consistent with Eng and Shackell (2001) and Devers et al (2000) who find an effect on CEO risk-taking but only for some forms of equity-based pay.…”
Section: Previous Results Relating Randd To Governance and Ownershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For managerial incentives Wu and Tu (2007) using Computstat data for large research intensive firms find that CEOs high powered compensation can increase R&D under high growth or with high slack, but that does not extend to other types of incentive pay. This limited result is consistent with Eng and Shackell (2001) and Devers et al (2000) who find an effect on CEO risk-taking but only for some forms of equity-based pay.…”
Section: Previous Results Relating Randd To Governance and Ownershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of technological innovation of enterprises can be measured by R&D expenditure per capita [30]; the level of technological innovation of enterprises can also be measured by the ratio of R&D expenditure to revenues [31]. The patent situation is important in the analysis of innovation capability [10].…”
Section: Technological Innovation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This argument in prior research still constitutes a relevant topic for research and tries to capture the optimal level of ownership and CEO incentive system (i.e. Florackis et al, 2009;Jurkus et al, 2011;Wu and Tu, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%