1992
DOI: 10.1016/1047-8477(92)90011-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centrosome organization and centriole architecture: Their sensitivity to divalent cations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

20
290
1
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 345 publications
(316 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
20
290
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose we were using the technique of whole mount preparation of isolated centrosomes and in vitro nucleation of microtubules. Such an analysis of isolated centrosomes (as opposed to in situ) can be extremely informative in revealing structural features of this organelle in more detail (see the work of Chretien et al 1997;Lange and Gull 1996b;Moritz et al 1995a;Paintrand et al 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this purpose we were using the technique of whole mount preparation of isolated centrosomes and in vitro nucleation of microtubules. Such an analysis of isolated centrosomes (as opposed to in situ) can be extremely informative in revealing structural features of this organelle in more detail (see the work of Chretien et al 1997;Lange and Gull 1996b;Moritz et al 1995a;Paintrand et al 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to centrosomes isolated from mammalian cells, Drosophila early embryonic centrosomes have an average size of about 0.75 lm as compared to about 0.5 lm for the typical mammalian centrosome. This size difference is due to the low amount of pericentriolar material in somatic mammalian cells and is illustrated by the fact that centrioles can easily be visualized in the mammalian centrosome (Komesli et al 1989;Lange and Gull 1996b;Paintrand et al 1992) also by whole mount techniques while the centriole from the early Drosophila embryo (as shown in our data) is almost impossible to discern concealed by the abundant pericentriolar material (compare also to TEM images of sections of isolated Drosophila centrosomes in Lange et al (2000) and Moritz et al (1995a). Debec et al (1999) characterized Drosophila early embryo centrosomes in situ through energy filtering TEM and observed in interphase centrosomes, structurally compact pericentriolar material that displayed long protrusion nucleating relatively few microtubules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPAP also cooperates with additional proteins, including CP110, in determining the length of nascent centrioles (Kohlmaier et al , 2009; Schmidt et al , 2009; Tang et al , 2009; Comartin et al , 2013; Lin et al , 2013; Sharma et al , 2016). Finally, centriole maturation is completed by the acquisition of subdistal and distal appendages (Paintrand et al , 1992; Tateishi et al , 2013). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malfunction in these processes may lead to the development of tumors (Brinkley and Goepfert, 1998;Doxsey, 1998;Salisbury et al, 1999). A previous study indicates that a proteinaceous linker between the pair of centrioles mediates their cohesion (Paintrand et al, 1992), though the identity of this linker remains unknown. Recent studies demonstrate that several proteins, including NIMA-related kinase 2 (Nek2), protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), C-Nap1, dynamin 2, and RanBP1, are involved in centriolar cohesion (Mayor et al, 2000;Meraldi and Nigg, 2001;Di Fiore et al, 2003;Thompson et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%