2020
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggaa238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centroid moment tensor inversions of offshore earthquakes using a three-dimensional velocity structure model: slip distributions on the plate boundary along the Nankai Trough

Abstract: SUMMARY Due to complex 3-D heterogeneous structures, conventional 1-D analysis techniques using onshore seismograms can yield incorrect estimation of earthquake source parameters, especially dip angles and centroid depths of offshore earthquakes. Combining long-term onshore seismic observations and numerical simulations of seismic wave propagation in a 3-D model, we conducted centroid moment tensor (CMT) inversions of earthquakes along the Nankai Trough between April 2004 and August 2019 to eval… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(107 reference statements)
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the optimal depth was very close to the upper surface of the Paci c Plate, high (> 80 %) VR solutions appeared at a wider depth range (36-56 km). These features are similar to CMT solutions in the Hyuga-nada region, southwest Japan (Figure 4 of Takemura et al 2020). The centroid depth constraint is also not high for shallow crustal earthquake ( Figure S2).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Although the optimal depth was very close to the upper surface of the Paci c Plate, high (> 80 %) VR solutions appeared at a wider depth range (36-56 km). These features are similar to CMT solutions in the Hyuga-nada region, southwest Japan (Figure 4 of Takemura et al 2020). The centroid depth constraint is also not high for shallow crustal earthquake ( Figure S2).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Additionally, the VR of the 3D CMT solution was not high (~57 %). With the exception of this event, the differences in focal mechanisms and centroid depths were not signi cant compared to the results for offshore earthquakes along the Nankai Trough (Figure 8 of Takemura et al 2020).…”
Section: Differences Between 3d Cmt and F-net Mt Catalogsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations