Centring justice in conceptualizing and improving access to urban nature

Abstract

As humanity has become increasingly urban, a growing number of people have been deprived of access to nature and the benefits it provides. This is especially true for marginalized groups, who often live in neighbourhoods where nature has been so diminished and degraded that it provides fewer types, and much lower levels of benefits. We review the literatures on human–nature relationships, urban sustainability and justice to create an actionable definition of ‘access to nature’ that people can use to advocate for and guide investments that improve access to nature in urban contexts. We show how the interplay of three dimensions of justice—recognitional, procedural and distributional—determines access to nature in cities, and how these dimensions are core to increasing access to urban nature. We present a design thinking framework that centres justice in creating interventions for access to nature, together with questions that can guide the process of designing and implementing new interventions. Lastly, we illustrate how our framework can be operationalized by showcasing three case studies that improve access to nature to marginalized communities in the United States: Latino Outdoors, Sogorea Te′ Land Trust and the Nature Imagery in Prisons Project. We conclude by re‐affirming the importance of centring justice in improving access to nature, so that all people can enjoy the benefits that nature provides and lead healthy, fulfilling lives. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Land trusts as a complementary solution to nature conservation system in Poland

“…The spatial distribution of areas protected by land trusts and the impact of public sector policy on this distribution is also being explored (Fishburn et al, 2013;Thurman & Parker, 2011). Recent literature on land trusts places, among other issues, social justice themes at the centre of its research (Beckman et al, 2023;Langhans et al, 2023).…”

Human well-being and natural infrastructure: assessing opportunities for equitable project planning and implementation

“…Beyond understanding the well-being benefits that are produced by NI projects, efforts to account for them should consider the distributional benefits. Certain communities enjoy a disproportionate share of nature-based amenities, while other communities suffer from a nature deficit (Strife and Downey, 2009;Leong et al, 2018;Flint et al, 2022;Langhans et al, 2023). This gap is recognized in the 2022 Memorandum of Understanding on Promoting Equitable Access to Nature in Nature-Deprived Communities 2 , which defines nature-deprived as disadvantaged communities that disproportionately lack access to the climate mitigation and human health benefits of natural areas.…”

Recognizing Patterns of Nature Contact Associated with Well-Being: An Exploratory Cluster Analysis

“…This development underscores the critical need for research into how varied patterns of nature contact may influence individuals’ mental health, as highlighted by Ningtyas et al [ 1 ], who explored the restorative effects of nature exposure on stress, anxiety, and depression levels in Indonesia, emphasizing its role in enhancing emotional well-being. The justice in access to urban nature is central to this discourse, as explored by Langhans et al [ 2 ], who emphasize the necessity for equitable access to green spaces to improve mental well-being across different communities.…”