2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centrifuge modelling of seismic soil structure interaction effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shear modulus reduction is reported to vary dramatically due to softening and should be representative of the site conditions (Ghosh and Madabhushi 2007). In a typical equivalent linear analysis, initial estimates of G and ξ are made, usually based on a linear elastic approximation, and then iterative linear analyses are performed, recalculating in each iteration the soil properties based on the estimated level of shear strain response.…”
Section: Theoretical Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shear modulus reduction is reported to vary dramatically due to softening and should be representative of the site conditions (Ghosh and Madabhushi 2007). In a typical equivalent linear analysis, initial estimates of G and ξ are made, usually based on a linear elastic approximation, and then iterative linear analyses are performed, recalculating in each iteration the soil properties based on the estimated level of shear strain response.…”
Section: Theoretical Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of soil liquefaction on gravity structures was studied by Lee and Focht [37], and Walker and Blair [61]. Dynamic soil-structure interaction under seismic loading was investigated by Ghosh and Madabhushi [28], Srbulov [55], and Dashti et al [16]. The pile supported structures tend to fail in the form of overturning or tilting as the surrounding soil loses its lateral support during soil liquefaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cases of rigid and flexible structures, the amplification factors near the surface were magnified 15% and 7%, respectively, compared with that of free-field surface. There are numerous documented case histories where the input motion to the structure is amplified compared with free-field surface [19]. The input motion to the foundation is affected by stresses in the soil induced by the propagating seismic wave as well as those resulting from the oscillation of the structure.…”
Section: Dry Granular Soil Responsementioning
confidence: 99%