2011
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centrifuge Modeling of the Cyclic Lateral Response of a Rigid Pile in Soft Clay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sand properties were taken to be the same as the super-fine silica sand used in the centrifuge tests in Lee et al (2013a) and Hu et al (2014a), with I D ¼ 43%, 74% and 85%; the sand thickness ratio H s /D is varied from 0•3 to 0•8; clay shear strength at the sand-clay interface s um ranges from 10 to 40 kPa; clay strength gradient k is between 1•5 and 2•5 kPa/m; and the footing conical angle varies from 3 to 21°. A value of 3 for soil sensitivity of kaolin clay is used, which is based on the experimental measurements of Hu et al (2014a) and close to the S t value of 2•5 reported by Zhang et al (2011) and 2-2•5 reported by Gan et al (2012). The aim of selecting the above parameters is to cover more footing shapes and soil properties that have not appeared in the centrifuge tests performed.…”
Section: Evolution Of Soil and Sand Plug Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sand properties were taken to be the same as the super-fine silica sand used in the centrifuge tests in Lee et al (2013a) and Hu et al (2014a), with I D ¼ 43%, 74% and 85%; the sand thickness ratio H s /D is varied from 0•3 to 0•8; clay shear strength at the sand-clay interface s um ranges from 10 to 40 kPa; clay strength gradient k is between 1•5 and 2•5 kPa/m; and the footing conical angle varies from 3 to 21°. A value of 3 for soil sensitivity of kaolin clay is used, which is based on the experimental measurements of Hu et al (2014a) and close to the S t value of 2•5 reported by Zhang et al (2011) and 2-2•5 reported by Gan et al (2012). The aim of selecting the above parameters is to cover more footing shapes and soil properties that have not appeared in the centrifuge tests performed.…”
Section: Evolution Of Soil and Sand Plug Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of this equation to predict undrained shear strength values for the clay used was verified using a Bounding Surface elastoplastic constitutive model and triaxial CIUC tests (Thompson 2011). Zhang et al (2011) showed there is a good agreement between undrained shear strength values obtained A dense layer of Nevada sand with an 8 m thickness, a relative density of 84%, and a void ratio of 0.57 was constructed below the clay layers. The soil profile, structural models, and instrumentation for the centrifuge tests described herein are shown in FIG.…”
Section: Centrifuge Tests and Geotechnical Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…17b) is about half the corresponding one measured in the previous cyclic test, which suggests progressive degradation of chalk or formation of a pile-chalk gap. Furthermore, each stiffness measured during test 5C_122 are of similar magnitude or lower than the stiffness measured for the higher load level in the previous test 5_C10, suggesting the occurrence of irrecoverable chalk degradation or gap formation (Zhang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Pile Lateral Stiffness During Cyclic Loadingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The site has been thoroughly characterised by two site investigations, one carried out in 2007 and one in 2011(SEtech, 2007Fugro, 2012a;Fugro, 2012b). A total number of five boreholes were drilled up to 20m depth and laboratory tests were undertaken on the chalk samples taken by rotary coring.…”
Section: Test Site and Ground Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%