1996
DOI: 10.1016/0892-8967(96)00031-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centrally fitted versus upper lid-attached rigid gas permeable lenses. Part II. A comparison of the clinical performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Autorefraction is commonly used as a screening method of over-refraction [9,10]. The usefulness of autorefraction has been demonstrated for monofocal [11] but not for MCL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Autorefraction is commonly used as a screening method of over-refraction [9,10]. The usefulness of autorefraction has been demonstrated for monofocal [11] but not for MCL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this result, the refraction of the contact lens is modified to avoid any residual error. In clinical practice an autorefractor is commonly used as a screening method of over-refraction for contact lenses users [9,10]. Indeed, its suitability in monofocal contact lens over-refraction has already been demonstrated [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over-refraction is the measurement of the residual refractive error of the eye when the patient is wearing the contact lens. In clinical practice an autorefractor is commonly used as a screening method of over-refraction for contact lenses users [121,122]. Its suitability in monofocal contact lens over-refraction was demonstrated in 1997 by Strang et al [123].…”
Section: Suitability To Perform Objective Measurements In Users Of Mu...mentioning
confidence: 99%