2022
DOI: 10.3837/tiis.2022.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centralized Machine Learning Versus Federated Averaging: A Comparison using MNIST Dataset

Abstract: A flood of information has occurred with the rise of the internet and digital devices in the fourth industrial revolution era. Every millisecond, massive amounts of structured and unstructured data are generated; smartphones, wearable devices, sensors, and self-driving cars are just a few examples of devices that currently generate massive amounts of data in our daily. Machine learning has been considered an approach to support and recognize patterns in data in many areas to provide a convenient way to other s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has led to the emergence of so-called federated learning (FL) methods, which allow multiple entities to build a common machine learning model without sharing data [23]. Most FL methods use the idea of averaging the values provided by the sources for each model parameter, with education being a domain where this idea is also widespread [24,25]. In [14], average values were calculated of the weights of the neural networks provided by the participating nodes for the prediction of student dropout to demonstrate that this federated approach improved on the results of a centralized approach and avoided the concentration of the data, thus maintaining privacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to the emergence of so-called federated learning (FL) methods, which allow multiple entities to build a common machine learning model without sharing data [23]. Most FL methods use the idea of averaging the values provided by the sources for each model parameter, with education being a domain where this idea is also widespread [24,25]. In [14], average values were calculated of the weights of the neural networks provided by the participating nodes for the prediction of student dropout to demonstrate that this federated approach improved on the results of a centralized approach and avoided the concentration of the data, thus maintaining privacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%