Central Venous Pressure in Optimal Blood Volume Maintenance

Wilson, Jan; Grow, John B.; Demong, Charles V.; Prevedel, Arthur E.; Owens, J. Cuthbert; Hamilton, William K.

doi:10.1097/00132586-196404000-00003

Cited by 34 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These authors described a fall in CVP with blood loss and a relationship between the CVP and blood transfusion. The technique of CVP monitoring was further popularized by Wilson and Grow 50 and soon became routine in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Based on scarce data, CVP became the standard tool for guiding fluid therapy, initially in the operating room and then in the ICU.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Central Venous Pressure Predict Fluid Responsiveness?*: A Systematic Review of the Literature and the Tale of Seven Mares

Marik

Baram

Vahid

2008

Chest

1,328

681

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Central Venous Pressure Predict Fluid Responsiveness?*: A Systematic Review of the Literature and the Tale of Seven Mares

Marik

Baram

Vahid

2008

Chest

1,328

681

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Although it was successfully used before to evaluate volume status especially in critically ill patients [79,80,151], it is now almost completely abandoned mainly due to its invasive nature. There are also meta-analyses questioning the accuracy of this technique to determine volume responsiveness [152,153].…”

Section: Less Commonly Used Objective Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One of the earliest methods was PAC, which has been used for almost half of a century especially in emergency departments and intensive care units [79,80]. However, since this method was inconvenient, time-consuming and invasive, innovative techniques like ultrasound evaluation started to replace the PAC.…”

Section: Carotid Artery -Corrected Flow Timementioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Volume Overload and Current Techniques for the Assessment of Fluid Status in Patients with Renal Disease

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Volume overload is an important, may be the foremost, independent prognostic factor determining the outcome of hemodialysis patients. Therefore, it is crucial to measure fluid status of these patients and avoid volume overload. This review aims to evaluate volume overload, its effects on patients with renal diseases and current methodologies measuring volume status in the body. These techniques will be first classified as clinical evaluation and non-clinical and/or instrumental techniques, which includes biomarkers, ultrasonography, relative blood volume monitoring, bioimpedance, echocardiography, pulmonary artery catheterization, esophageal and/or suprasternal Doppler, and blood viscosity. Advantages and limitations of these different techniques will be reviewed extensively by comparing each other. At last, insights gained from this review can highlight the future prospects in this active area of research.

show abstract

“…Catheter is secured in place and sterile dressing applied. [8] Subclavian vein cannulation: [9] Under strict aseptic precautions, the above said landmarks identified, skin was punctured with an introducer needle attached with a five ml syringe containing heparinized saline, two to three cm caudal to the midpoint of clavicle far enough from its inferior edge to avoid a downward angulation of the needle as it is walked under the posterior surface of the clavicle. The needle tip is directed towards the suprasternal notch.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Study Of Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation- Central Approach Versus Subclavian Vein Cannulation – Infraclavicular Approach

2016

AIMDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Central venous cannulation is a commonly used perioperative procedure to monitor the critically ill patients. The aim of this study is anatomical landmark based cannulation of internal jugular vein and subclavian vein and to determine the outcome, technical ease, complication rate. Though ultrasound guided central venous cannulation may be the gold standard method, it may not be available everywhere. Anaesthesiology residents performed the procedure under the guidance of faculty members in operation theatres based on anatomical land marks. Methods: We prospectively evaluated the performance of central venous cannulation by anaesthesiology residents through either internal jugular vein or subclavian vein based on the anatomical landmark guided techniques. Fifty patients posted for major surgeries were included in the study. Results: The success rate of the procedure, the numbers of attempts, complication rate between both groups are comparable to each other based on the statistical analysis. The time to perform internal jugular vein cannulation is significantly shorter than the time required for subclavian vein cannulation. Conclusion: In places where ultrasound imaging facilities are not available, anatomical land mark based techniques will help us to do the procedure. This study dispels the impression that Internal jugular vein is technically easier with reduced complication rate than subclavian vein cannulation. Results are comparable with each other.

show abstract

Central Venous Pressure in Optimal Blood Volume Maintenance

Cited by 34 publications

References 0 publications

Does Central Venous Pressure Predict Fluid Responsiveness?*: A Systematic Review of the Literature and the Tale of Seven Mares

Does Central Venous Pressure Predict Fluid Responsiveness?*: A Systematic Review of the Literature and the Tale of Seven Mares

Effects of Volume Overload and Current Techniques for the Assessment of Fluid Status in Patients with Renal Disease

A Comparative Study Of Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation- Central Approach Versus Subclavian Vein Cannulation – Infraclavicular Approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About