2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-007-9259-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central venous catheters as a vascular access modality for pediatric hemodialysis

Abstract: Uncuffed central venous catheters are both needed and useful for short-term hemodialysis. Vascular access for extended durations may be provided by cuffed tunneled catheters. Infection is the major serious concern with both uncuffed and cuffed catheters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This possibility is supported by our analysis that showed an increased risk of thrombosis with temporary catheters (RR = 1.41). Our data are similar to data published by Fadel et al who demonstrated in a prospective study of temporary uncuffed DLC (N = 195) that 44 % had catheter complications, with a 31 % thrombosis rate using an uncuffed DLC (mean DLC duration 116 days) [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This possibility is supported by our analysis that showed an increased risk of thrombosis with temporary catheters (RR = 1.41). Our data are similar to data published by Fadel et al who demonstrated in a prospective study of temporary uncuffed DLC (N = 195) that 44 % had catheter complications, with a 31 % thrombosis rate using an uncuffed DLC (mean DLC duration 116 days) [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Catheter-related bacteraemia rates in children on HD were found to vary 1.5 and 8.6/1000 catheter days in different series involving from 13 up to 89 patients [7,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. In our study, the overall rate of CVC-related infections requiring intravenous antibiotics was 1.9 episodes/1000 catheter days, with a smaller number requiring CVC changes (0.9 episodes/1000 catheter days).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Successful hemodialysis depends on the maintenance of adequate vascular access. There are better outcomes when patients commence hemodialysis with a functional AVF compared to those who initiate treatment with catheter access [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. A functional AVF is the ideal form of vascular access because it brings lower complication rates and longer event-free patency than catheter access [5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%