Central venous catheterization: An updated review of historical aspects, indications, techniques, and complications

Pires, Rafael Cardoso; Rodrigues, Noslen; Machado, Jonathan; Cruz, Ricardo Pedrini

doi:10.4103/ts.ts_10_17

Cited by 10 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The CVC insertion is generally done in the subclavian vein, internal jugular vein and femoral vein. 1,2 In this case, the position of the CVC tip is placed over the SVC region, so there is a possibility of accidental suturing when performing the cannulation suture. One of the methods to remove the remaining CVC is surgery.…”

Section: Case Reportmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Complications from this CVC insertion procedure can include mechanical (hematoma, arterial puncture, pneumothorax, hemothorax, catheter misplacement, stenosis), infection (insertion site infection, CVC colonization, and bloodstream infection) and thrombotic (deep vein thrombosis). 1,2 The sutured catheter into the heart or vessel wall during Mitral Valve Replacement (MVR) is a rare complication and difficult to repair. If there is any mistake when removing the catheter, it can tear the blood vessel, cardiac tamponade and even death.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Central venous catheters retention in a patient with mitral valve replacement: a case report

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Retention of central venous catheters (CVC) is one complication that may occur when open-heart surgery is performed (such as mitral valve replacement). In this case report, we describe case retention of CVC in a patient with Mitral Valve Replacement (MVR) related to sutured of Superior Vena Cava (SVC) wall on cannulation site. Case Presentation: A 15-year-old boy was admitted to Sanglah Hospital with a history of Heart failure with severe regurgitation of the mitral valve, severe tricuspid regurgitation, and left ventricular dysfunction due to rheumatic heart disease. Mitral valve replacement, tricuspid valve repair and left atrial reduction was performed. After five days of postoperative observation, the CVC could be removed. However, there is resistance when removing the catheter. After diagnostic examination, it was found that the CVC was sutured to the superior vena cava wall. The patient was then scheduled for a redo sternotomy to evacuate the CVC. The patient was discharged seven days after redo sternotomy was performed without any further postoperative complications. Conclusions: Retention of CVC during open-heart surgery is one complication that increases the risk for morbidity or mortality to the patient after heart surgery.

show abstract

Section: Case Reportmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Central venous catheters retention in a patient with mitral valve replacement: a case report

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Surface modification strategies for hemodialysis catheters to prevent catheter‐related infections: A review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Insertion of a central venous catheter is one of the most common invasive procedures applied in hemodialysis therapy for end‐stage renal disease. The most important complication of a central venous catheter is catheter‐related infections that increase hospitalization and duration of intensive care unit stay, cost of treatment, mortality, and morbidity rates. Pathogenic microorganisms, such as, bacteria and fungi, enter the body from the catheter insertion site and the surface of the catheter can become colonized. The exopolysaccharide‐based biofilms from bacterial colonies on the surface are the main challenge in the treatment of infections. Catheter lock solutions and systemic antibiotic treatment, which are commonly used in the treatment of hemodialysis catheter‐related infections, are insufficient to prevent and terminate the infections and eventually the catheter needs to be replaced. The inadequacy of these approaches in termination and prevention of infection revealed the necessity of coating of hemodialysis catheters with bactericidal and/or antiadhesive agents. Silver compounds and nanoparticles, anticoagulants (e.g., heparin), antibiotics (e.g., gentamicin and chlorhexidine) are some of the agents used for this purpose. The effectiveness of few commercial hemodialysis catheters that were coated with antibacterial agents has been tested in clinical trials against catheter‐related infections of pathogenic bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis with promising results. Novel biomedical materials and engineering techniques, such as, surface micro/nano patterning and the conjugation of antimicrobial peptides, enzymes, metallic cations, and hydrophilic polymers (e.g., poly [ethylene glycol]) on the surface, has been suggested recently.

show abstract

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters and Nontunneled Central Venous Catheters

Kissane¹,

Hughes²,

Cantwell³

et al. 2020

Image-Guided Interventions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Central venous catheterization: An updated review of historical aspects, indications, techniques, and complications

Cited by 10 publications

References 2 publications

Central venous catheters retention in a patient with mitral valve replacement: a case report

Central venous catheters retention in a patient with mitral valve replacement: a case report

Surface modification strategies for hemodialysis catheters to prevent catheter‐related infections: A review

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters and Nontunneled Central Venous Catheters

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About