2021
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central sensitization of dorsal root potentials and dorsal root reflexes: An in vitro study in the mouse spinal cord.

Abstract: Background: Axo-axonic contacts onto central terminals of primary afferents modulate sensory inputs to the spinal cord. These contacts produce primary afferent depolarization (PAD), which serves as a mechanism for presynaptic inhibition, and also produce dorsal root reflexes (DRRs), which may regulate the excitability of peripheral terminals and second order neurons. We aimed to identify changes in these responses as a consequence of peripheral inflammation. Methods: In vitro spinal cord recordings of spontane… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both of these predictions from our interpretation have been proved experimentally. Inflammatory treatment has been shown to increase the production of dorsal root reflexes in vivo and in vitro (Lin et al, 2000;Vicente-Baz et al, 2022) as well as to potentiate spontaneous activity in dorsal horn neurons (Zain and Bonin, 2019). This interpretation of results places firing synchrony at the center of the mechanisms mediating central sensitization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both of these predictions from our interpretation have been proved experimentally. Inflammatory treatment has been shown to increase the production of dorsal root reflexes in vivo and in vitro (Lin et al, 2000;Vicente-Baz et al, 2022) as well as to potentiate spontaneous activity in dorsal horn neurons (Zain and Bonin, 2019). This interpretation of results places firing synchrony at the center of the mechanisms mediating central sensitization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As previously discussed, peripheral inflammation leads to an increase in the backfiring of nociceptive primary afferents (Lin et al, 2000). We have shown recently that this enhanced activity caused by peripheral inflammation develops quickly and persists in the isolated spinal cord demonstrating that the mechanisms underlying backfiring of the afferents are contained within the cord (Vicente-Baz et al, 2022). Therefore, as a secondary objective we aimed at evaluating the impact of a peripheral inflammation on synchronous activity of dorsal horn neurons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, a persistent nociceptive input to small diameter afferents at the OA joint may lead to increased neuronal firing, persistent nociception, and segmental sensitization in the CNS 81,82. This may incite an antidromic reflex neurogenic inflammation and the release of neurogenic substances (eg, substance P, calcitonin gene-related peptide) toward the peripherally neurologically supplied skeletal muscle and joint tissues by the common spinal sensitized segment 77,83–87. This hypothesis has been tested in preclinical studies with the observation of increased neurogenic-related peptides, inflammation, and fibrosis skeletal muscle in segmentally related skeletal muscle;81,82,85,88,89 future studies are required to explore this alternate mechanism in humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…81,82 This may incite an antidromic reflex neurogenic inflammation and the release of neurogenic substances (eg, substance P, calcitonin gene-related peptide) toward the peripherally neurologically supplied skeletal muscle and joint tissues by the common spinal sensitized segment. 77,[83][84][85][86][87] This hypothesis has been tested in preclinical studies with the observation of increased neurogenic-related peptides, inflammation, and fibrosis skeletal muscle in segmentally related skeletal muscle; 81,82,85,88,89 future studies are required to explore this alternate mechanism in humans. Importantly, to the best of our knowledge, no experimental studies have been designed to examine the effects of an OA disease-modifying treatment on MPS and MTrPs-related outcomes.…”
Section: Hypothetical Mechanisms Underlying the Mps Coexistence With Oamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the future direction of KCNQ neural mechanosensation literature ought to focus more on the clinical and translational use of these pharmacotherapeutic options, as most of the literature used to support this review was based on animal models alone. Despite this, there is strong evidence that could support the initiation of future clinical trials, especially for auditory pathologies as well as in PD [ 14 , 80 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 ], and developments for understanding the effects that antimicrobial agents have on these potassium ion channels [ 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 ]. Additionally, the scope of this review was on neural modulation, yet there is a growing amount of literature on the behavior of KCNQ channels in cardiac modulations as well, especially in the cellular processes involved in arrhythmia [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 139 , 140 , 141 ,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%