Central practitioners’ developing legitimate peripheral participation in a community of practice for changing schools

Abstract

As new technologies continue to shape society, there has been a greater need for communities of practice to facilitate changing teaching and learning practices through technology in schools. Legitimate peripheral participation through these communities of practice has become an essential means to spread and support this technology integration movement, but understanding this participation in communities has been limited. This paper reports on a study of how central practitioners developed legitimate peripheral participation episodes in an inter-organisational, international community of practice. It describes the qualitative, case study approach to the study, and outlines the community of practice, its central practitioners and the legitimate peripheral participation episodes in which they participated. The paper presents and discusses essential central practitioner individual and organisational factors which enabled the continuity and change of legitimate peripheral participation episodes in the community. Individual factors to emerge from the study include central practitioners' desire for continuous professional development and individual agency. Organisational factors include an organisation's distinctive mission, its distinctive roles, and constant negotiation, including conflicts of interest, between organisations and their members. The paper concludes with considerations of the value and relevance of legitimate peripheral participation in an inter-organisational community of practice for changing practices.

Design students meet industry players: Feedback and creativity in communities of practice

“…As indicated by research, CoPs can play a key role in learning: they encourage socially mediated learning through pragmatic knowledge networks (Allee, 2000;Gunawardena et al, 2009;Hildreth & Kimble, 2004;Schønheyder & Nordby, 2018), they facilitate peer assessment and reflection (Rourke & Coleman, 2009) and they provide valuable support for novices through LPP (Johnston, 2016;Stone et al, 2017;Woo, 2015) across educational, industrial and governmental sectors (Bate & Robert, 2002;Khalid & Strange, 2016;Pattinson & Preece, 2014;Tight, 2015).…”

Adjusting sails for changing winds: exploring Reddit use for professional purposes in higher education

“…Modern technologies like the internet allow more CoP groups to emerge and organize differently. For instance, the connective affordances of the internet help collapse geographical and temporal limitations, which is especially useful when CoP members live in dispersed areas and time zones (Wenger et al, 2002 ; Woo, 2015 ). CoPs have often been studied in the context of social media research.…”

Free Asynchronous Professional Development by, from, and for Instructional Designers: How the Informal Learning Opportunities Shape our Professional Learning and Design Practices

“…Facilitating a CoP group can be performed online by taking advantage of modern technologies. As a result, an online CoP can bring people together regardless of their location and time zone (Muljana et al, 2020;Woo, 2015). It also potentially addresses the budget limitations that working professionals may face (Eaton & Pasquini, 2020).…”