2020
DOI: 10.1111/oik.07509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central place foraging drives niche partitioning in seabirds

Abstract: When species coexist, it is expected that they will reduce competition through niche partitioning or spatial segregation. We investigated the importance of niche partitioning versus spatial segregation across a seabird community where food and foraging constraints vary seasonally. Spatial clustering of seabird density in the western Irish Sea occurred in both seasons, with hotspots of seabird occurrence significantly higher in summer (Moran's I: 0.29) than winter (Moran's I: 0.19). A positive correlation betwe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(76 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the species level, Gouldian finches were not only food neophobic but also hesitated to incorporate novel food into their diet, demonstrating dietary conservatism confirming the second part of prediction 5. This foraging response can be attributed to their food specialism (Brazill-Boast et al, 2011) and does not seem to be the response to interspecific competition (Jessopp et al, 2020). Similar dietary conservatism has been found in the specialized snail kite (Beissinger et al, 1994).…”
Section: Incorporation Of Novel Food Into the Dietsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…On the species level, Gouldian finches were not only food neophobic but also hesitated to incorporate novel food into their diet, demonstrating dietary conservatism confirming the second part of prediction 5. This foraging response can be attributed to their food specialism (Brazill-Boast et al, 2011) and does not seem to be the response to interspecific competition (Jessopp et al, 2020). Similar dietary conservatism has been found in the specialized snail kite (Beissinger et al, 1994).…”
Section: Incorporation Of Novel Food Into the Dietsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Species can segregate along both the spatial and temporal dimensions of their ecological niche (e.g. Jessopp et al, 2020;Watabe et al, 2022), but those belonging to the same guild can pursue specific microhabitats and foods as the principal factors that regulate the structure of the community (Ross, 1986;Moreno & Castro, 1995;Brandl et al, 2020;Colloca et al, 2010). The feeding and foraging preferences of different taxa were potentially driven by specific feeding capabilities and behavioural traits (see below), supported by evidence that species followed by genus were the most important drivers of niche partitioning within the community.…”
Section: Drivers Of Niche Partitioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have demonstrated that both spatial (e.g. Jessopp et al, 2020) and temporal (e.g. Watabe et al, 2022) variations drive niche partitioning in natural populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the principle of competitive exclusion, spatial and temporal resource partitioning is a key mechanism to reduce competitive pressure for shared resources in sympatric species (Schoener, 1974). For colonial breeding seabirds that function as central place foragers when breeding, competition for resources near colonies may influence habitat use, prey selection, energetic expenditure, and ultimately population sizes (Furness and Birkhead, 1984;Lewis et al, 2001;Wakefield et al, 2013;Oppel et al, 2015;Jessopp et al, 2020;Weber et al, 2021). Habitat segregation in seabirds is well documented and occurs not just between sympatrically breeding species (Kappes et al, 2010;Young et al, 2010Young et al, , 2015Linnebjerg et al, 2013;Robertson et al, 2014;Barger et al, 2016), but also between age classes (Pettex et al, 2019), sexes (Lewis et al, 2002;Phillips R.A. et al, 2004;Camphuysen et al, 2015), and nearby populations of the same species (Rayner et al, 2011;Wiley et al, 2012;Ceia et al, 2015;Shaffer et al, 2017;Bolton et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%