2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.07.1143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central Nervous System Efficacy of Furmonertinib (AST2818) Versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment for EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: Results From the FURLONG Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(38 reference statements)
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the efficacy of furmonertinib 240 mg orally once daily did not show a promising ORR possibly due to the small sample size, although the median CNS-PFS was NR with furmonertinib 240 mg orally once daily, and all the patients with 160 mg or 240 mg orally once daily furmonertinib achieved CNS disease control. Third, the definition of CNS-PFS in this pooled post-hos analysis was consistent with previous published CNS analysis of third-generation EGFR TKIs including AURA extension and AURA2 pooled [ 31 ], FLAURA [ 32 ], FURLONG [ 19 ], however, the observed treatment benefit in the CNS-PFS analysis might be influenced as patients did not continue to receive brain scans following disease progression (irrespective of site of progression) or discontinuation from study with no CNS progression or death were censored at date last evaluable CNS assessment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, the efficacy of furmonertinib 240 mg orally once daily did not show a promising ORR possibly due to the small sample size, although the median CNS-PFS was NR with furmonertinib 240 mg orally once daily, and all the patients with 160 mg or 240 mg orally once daily furmonertinib achieved CNS disease control. Third, the definition of CNS-PFS in this pooled post-hos analysis was consistent with previous published CNS analysis of third-generation EGFR TKIs including AURA extension and AURA2 pooled [ 31 ], FLAURA [ 32 ], FURLONG [ 19 ], however, the observed treatment benefit in the CNS-PFS analysis might be influenced as patients did not continue to receive brain scans following disease progression (irrespective of site of progression) or discontinuation from study with no CNS progression or death were censored at date last evaluable CNS assessment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In a phase 2b study, the CNS objective response rate (ORR) of furmonertinib 80 mg orally once daily in EGFR T790M mutated NSCLC patients was 66% and the median CNS-PFS was 11.6 months [ 17 ]. In the phase 3 FURLONG study, furmonertinib was associated with higher PFS and CNS-PFS compared with gefitinib in EGFR sensitizing mutation positive, untreated, CNS metastatic patients [ 18 , 19 ]. These data had demonstrated the CNS efficacy of furmonertinib 80 mg orally once daily, but the evidence of other doses for CNS metastases was lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprisingly furmonertinib achieved superior PFS over gefitinib regardless of CNS metastasis. 21 More granular analysis of the FURLONG trial focusing on the CNS PFS also demonstrated superior CNS PFS of furmonertinib over gefitinib with an HR of 0.40. Importantly, the CNS PFS advantage for furmonertinib was similar for del19 or L858R patients 21 and compares favorably to the HR for CNS PFS in the overall FLAURA 22 ( Figure 2B ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“… 21 More granular analysis of the FURLONG trial focusing on the CNS PFS also demonstrated superior CNS PFS of furmonertinib over gefitinib with an HR of 0.40. Importantly, the CNS PFS advantage for furmonertinib was similar for del19 or L858R patients 21 and compares favorably to the HR for CNS PFS in the overall FLAURA 22 ( Figure 2B ). The numerical value of CNS PFS in the furmonertinib arm of FURLONG was similar to the osimertinib arm of FLAURA but given the CNS PFS are constrained by the difference in patient characteristics (sex, age, number of CNS lesions, EGFR mutation subtype: del19 versus L858R, smoking status), we are comparing HRs rather than the actual CNS PFS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the AENEAS study, almonertinib achieved longer median CNS-PFS over gefitinib in cFAS [29.0 vs 8.3 months; HR: 0.323 (95% CI: 0.181–0.576); p < 0.0001] [ 29 ]. Furmonertinib achieved a median CNS-PFS of 11.6 (95% CI: 8.3–13.8) months for EGFR T790M mutated patients in its phase IIb study for the cFAS and further prolonged the median CNS-PFS while compared with gefitinib in cFAS (20.8 vs 9.8 months; HR: 0.40 [95% CI: 0.23–0.71]; p = 0.0011) in the FURLONG study [ 15 , 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%