2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central nervous system anomalies in craniofacial microsomia: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CNS involvement has been described in OAVS, and frequencies range between 2% and 69%, 7 including brain atrophy, hypoplasia of the cerebellum, corpus callosum dysgenesis, asymmetric lateral ventricles, and aqueductal stenosis with obstructive hydrocephalus, cerebral lipomas, and cerebral hamartomas. 6,7,9,10…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…CNS involvement has been described in OAVS, and frequencies range between 2% and 69%, 7 including brain atrophy, hypoplasia of the cerebellum, corpus callosum dysgenesis, asymmetric lateral ventricles, and aqueductal stenosis with obstructive hydrocephalus, cerebral lipomas, and cerebral hamartomas. 6,7,9,10…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But indeed, neural tube defects have been rarely reported associated with OAVS, most likely because of limited MR imaging availability. However, syringomyelia, meningocele with occipital cranium bifidum, and a defective arch of C1 as well as spina bifida cystica and occulta have been described 7,11121314,16,17 with a prevalence of 1% to 31%. 9,10,17…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For some authors, ear anomalies must coexist with hypoplasia of facial structures, other adopts ear anomalies plus any major anomaly of craniofacial, ocular, or vertebral regions, there are those who admit isolated microtia, and the consensus by the FACIAL network (Facial Asymmetry Collaborative for Interdisciplinary Assessment and Learning) that besides the previously mentioned criteria, includes combinations of facial asymmetry, facial tags, epibulbar dermoids, macrostomia, and preauricular tags. 5,8,10,[13][14][15]17,18,26,27 Such disagreement mirrors the complexity and heterogeneity underlying CFM. It also impacts the consistency and comparability of clinic, etiopathogenic and epidemiologic studies, hampering translation of research into care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O desenvolvimento craniofacial é um processo morfogenético tridimensional complexo, altamente orquestrado, envolvendo centenas de genes que controlam a padronização coordenada, a diferenciação e a proliferação de tecidos de múltiplas origens embrionárias (TWIGG;WILKIE, 2015;XAVIER et al, 2016). Distúrbios no desenvolvimento normal do crânio durante a embriogênese podem manifestar-se em malformações que afetam as estruturas do crânio (ossos e sistema nervoso central) e as estruturas orofaciais (KOUSKOURA et al, 2011;RENKEMA et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introdução E Revisão De Literaturaunclassified