2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central Line Bundle Implementation in US Intensive Care Units and Impact on Bloodstream Infections

Abstract: BackgroundCentral line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) represent a serious patient safety issue. To prevent these infections, bundled interventions are increasingly recommended. We examine the extent of adoption of Central Line (CL) Bundle elements throughout US intensive care units (ICU) and determine their effectiveness in preventing CLABSIs.Methodology/Principal FindingsIn this cross-sectional study, National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) hospitals provided the following: ICU-specific NHSN-rep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
142
0
18

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
8
142
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed that nine studies (60%) had adult population as their target audience (9,(17)(18)(22)(23)25) , two of them (13,3%) were carried out with children (5,24) , three of them (20%) with newborns (15)(16)20) , and one of them (6,7%) with both populations, in pediatric and neonatology units (14) . Eight of them (53,3%) were developed in the USA (6,9,(15)(16)18,(22)(23)25) and only three (20%) were developed in Latin America, two of them in Brazil (20)(21) and one in Colombia (14) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We observed that nine studies (60%) had adult population as their target audience (9,(17)(18)(22)(23)25) , two of them (13,3%) were carried out with children (5,24) , three of them (20%) with newborns (15)(16)20) , and one of them (6,7%) with both populations, in pediatric and neonatology units (14) . Eight of them (53,3%) were developed in the USA (6,9,(15)(16)18,(22)(23)25) and only three (20%) were developed in Latin America, two of them in Brazil (20)(21) and one in Colombia (14) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight of them (53,3%) were developed in the USA (6,9,(15)(16)18,(22)(23)25) and only three (20%) were developed in Latin America, two of them in Brazil (20)(21) and one in Colombia (14) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations