2006
DOI: 10.1214/009117906000000179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central limit theorem for stationary linear processes

Abstract: We establish the central limit theorem for linear processes with dependent innovations including martingales and mixingale type of assumptions as defined in McLeish [Ann. Probab. 5 (1977) 616--621] and motivated by Gordin [Soviet Math. Dokl. 10 (1969) 1174--1176]. In doing so we shall preserve the generality of the coefficients, including the long range dependence case, and we shall express the variance of partial sums in a form easy to apply. Ergodicity is not required.Comment: Published at http://dx.doi.org/… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…innovations whereas Phillips and Solo (1992) developed CLT and invariance principles for sums of linear processes based on Beveridge-Nelson decomposition. Peligrad and Utev (2006) extended Ibragimov and Linnik (1971, Theorem 18.6.5) for linear processes with innovations following a more general dependence framework. Gordin (1969) introduced a general method for proving central limit theorems for stationary processes using martingale approximation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…innovations whereas Phillips and Solo (1992) developed CLT and invariance principles for sums of linear processes based on Beveridge-Nelson decomposition. Peligrad and Utev (2006) extended Ibragimov and Linnik (1971, Theorem 18.6.5) for linear processes with innovations following a more general dependence framework. Gordin (1969) introduced a general method for proving central limit theorems for stationary processes using martingale approximation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However when b n → ∞, our conditions (i) and (ii) are equivalent to Wang's ones. Its proof is based on an approximation by m-dependent random fields, a coefficientaveraging procedure inspired by Peligrad and Utev [26], and a big/small blocking summation in order to apply a central limit theorem for triangular array of weighted i.i.d. random variables.…”
Section: A Central Limit Theorem For Weighted Sumsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 2.2 (c) in [20] yields a central limit theorem for strongly mixing linear triangular arrays of type (1.1). They assume that {|ξ i | 2+δ } is uniformly integrable for a certain δ > 0.…”
Section: Central Limit Theorem For Triangular Arrays Of Dependent Ranmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In [5], the random variables ξ i are assumed to be uniformly bounded. The proof of Theorem 2.2 (c) in [20] relies on a variation on Theorem 4.1 in [25] (see Theorem B in [20]). The proof of Theorem 3.1, which is postponed to the Appendix, also makes use of a variation on Theorem 4.1 in [25] (see also [26]).…”
Section: Central Limit Theorem For Triangular Arrays Of Dependent Ranmentioning
confidence: 99%