1997
DOI: 10.1214/aop/1024404295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central limit theorem for linear processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the ψ-weak dependence, Coulon-Prieur and Doukhan (2000) provided a CLT for triangular arrays with applications for linear arrays. As in Peligrad and Utev (1997), the CLT result for the linear triangular arrays of Coulon-Prieur and Doukhan (2000) can yield an ordinary CLT for the partial sums of the linear processes with ψ-weakly dependent innovations. Here we consider random CLTs for the partial sums under Assumption 2(a) or Assumption 2 …”
Section: Random Central Limit Theorems For Partial Sumsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under the ψ-weak dependence, Coulon-Prieur and Doukhan (2000) provided a CLT for triangular arrays with applications for linear arrays. As in Peligrad and Utev (1997), the CLT result for the linear triangular arrays of Coulon-Prieur and Doukhan (2000) can yield an ordinary CLT for the partial sums of the linear processes with ψ-weakly dependent innovations. Here we consider random CLTs for the partial sums under Assumption 2(a) or Assumption 2 …”
Section: Random Central Limit Theorems For Partial Sumsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Juodis and Rackaukas (2007) established a CLT for self-normalized sums of a linear process, while Mynbaev (2009) dealt with a CLT for weighted sums of a linear process. For dependent innovations, Peligrad and Utev (1997) studied CLTs of linear processes under several well-known mixings and associated sequences, and their results were extended to ψ-weakly dependent processes by Coulon-Prieur and Doukhan (2000). Wu and Min (2005) and Wu and Woodroofe (2004) considered CLTs of linear processes under a wide class of dependent innovations whose dependence structure involves conditional moments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let X k,n := (x k −x n ) σ n √ S n (ε k − βδ k ) =: a k,n Z k , then the proof of this theorem is on the basis of Theorem 2.2 in Peligrad and Utev (1997).…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lemma directly follows from Lemma 2.2 and the following observation. Var(2Z~) < Var( E EzG+,) <l: • maxVar( EZi, +,).The following theorem is a variant of Theorem 2.1 from[10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%