AIP Conference Proceedings 2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.3076747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central engines of Gamma Ray Bursts. Magnetic mechanism in the collapsar model.

Abstract: Abstract. In this study we explore the magnetic mechanism of hypernovae and relativistic jets of long duration gamma ray bursts within the collapsar scenario. This is an extension of our earlier work [1]. We track the collapse of massive rotating stars onto a rotating central black hole using axisymmetric general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic code that utilizes a realistic equation of state and takes into account the cooling associated with emission of neutrinos and the energy losses due to dissociation of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the initial stage of the simulation spherically symmetric accretion occurs and the magnetic flux accumulates on the horizon of the BH. At the moment when the magnetic flux exceeds the critical value (see Barkov & Komissarov 2008a;Komissarov & Barkov 2009, for more details), the BZ mechanism gets activated and a magnetically driven jet is launched. The accumulation phase can be clearly seen in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the initial stage of the simulation spherically symmetric accretion occurs and the magnetic flux accumulates on the horizon of the BH. At the moment when the magnetic flux exceeds the critical value (see Barkov & Komissarov 2008a;Komissarov & Barkov 2009, for more details), the BZ mechanism gets activated and a magnetically driven jet is launched. The accumulation phase can be clearly seen in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence has emerged that at least some HNe are accompanied by gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) (Galama et al 1998;van Paradijs et al 2000;Stanek et al 2003;Malesani et al 2004;Woosley & Bloom 2006). The two most popular models to explain the connection between the collapse of a massive star and a GRB, the collapsar model of MacFadyen & Woosley (1999);MacFadyen et al (2001); Woosley & Heger (2003); Barkov & Komissarov (2008) and the magnetar model (e.g., LeBlanc & Wilson 1970;Wheeler et al 2000;Akiyama et al 2003;Burrows et al 2007;Komissarov & Barkov 2007;Obergaulinger & Aloy 2017), would also necessitate intrinsically aspherical HNe. A key ingredient in both of these models is a rapidly rotating progenitor, so HNe from these sources may also provide a natural explanation for larger HN rates in the past, as rapid rotation in stars is predicted to be more common at low metallicity (Woosley & Bloom 2006;Woosley & Heger 2006;Stacy et al 2011;Stacy & Bromm 2013).…”
Section: Early Evolution and Extremely Metal Poor Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observe these jets as gamma ray bursts [38]. While there are competing theories about the origin of jets, numerical studies indicate that it is more likely that astrophysical jets are the result of the BZ mechanism rather than the Penrose mechanism or accretion disk braking [36,38,40] , for at least some sets of parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We will assume that the collapsar model [26][27][28], whereby the iron core of a progenitor star collapses into a black hole, describes some of the observed long gamma ray bursts and is followed by jet emission which is powered by the Blandford-Znajeck (BZ) mechanism [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. We observe these jets as gamma ray bursts [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%