2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central CRF and acute stress differentially modulate probabilistic reversal learning in male and female rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, even though stress increased these measures, it did not have a disproportionately greater effect in females. These impairments are in keeping with previous work showing that restraint stress (or increased CRF activity) generally slows reward-related decision latencies, irrespective of whether these stressors alter the direction of choice on different forms of cost/benefit decision making ( Bryce et al, 2020 ; Bryce and Floresco, 2016 , 2021 ; Shafiei et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, even though stress increased these measures, it did not have a disproportionately greater effect in females. These impairments are in keeping with previous work showing that restraint stress (or increased CRF activity) generally slows reward-related decision latencies, irrespective of whether these stressors alter the direction of choice on different forms of cost/benefit decision making ( Bryce et al, 2020 ; Bryce and Floresco, 2016 , 2021 ; Shafiei et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, a floor effect existed in the females where it was difficult to see decreased lever pressing from a low baseline in both an outcome devaluation task and with Gq-DREADD mediated activation of CRF+ aBNST neurons in concurrent choice. Sex differences have been observed previously in appetitive learning and lever pressing tasks, where females are less engaged compared to males [51][52][53][54]. Future experiments are needed to determine the cause of these sex differences in lever pressing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The studies by Bryce and Floresco [105] and Dieterich [106] revealed the role of stress hormones in sensitivity to feedback. In the former, increased corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) signaling reduced negative feedback sensitivity in rats, while in the latter, chronic corticosterone administration decreased the sensitivity of mice to positive feedback, which has been interpreted as a robust blunting of positive processing [106].…”
Section: Biased Sensitivity To Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%