2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.geobios.2017.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cenozoic batoids from Contamana (Peruvian Amazonia) with focus on freshwater potamotrygonins and their paleoenvironmental significance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The special ecological circumstances of the Pebas are thought to have also spurred diversification in crocodylians(Salas- Gismondi et al, 2015) and mollusks(Nuttall, 1990). Supporting our arguments,Chabain et al (2017) show that proposed potamotrygonid fossil teeth recovered from the Oligocene-late Miocene from the Contamana region in Peru show morphological disparities that relate to ecological adaptations and diversification.The estimate for the age of origin of Potamotrygoninae (26 Ma) is older than the 23 Ma proposed byLovejoy et al (1998), but younger than the 38.2 (30.1-47.7) Ma proposed byBloom and Lovejoy (2017).However, all three of these estimates roughly coincide with the age of Miocene marine incursions and the Pebas wetlands, and the error estimate for the age proposed here (21 to 32 Ma) overlaps with these earlier estimates. Our age estimates for the Potamotrygoninae origin contrasts with older ages proposed by some authors based on fossil evidence.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The special ecological circumstances of the Pebas are thought to have also spurred diversification in crocodylians(Salas- Gismondi et al, 2015) and mollusks(Nuttall, 1990). Supporting our arguments,Chabain et al (2017) show that proposed potamotrygonid fossil teeth recovered from the Oligocene-late Miocene from the Contamana region in Peru show morphological disparities that relate to ecological adaptations and diversification.The estimate for the age of origin of Potamotrygoninae (26 Ma) is older than the 23 Ma proposed byLovejoy et al (1998), but younger than the 38.2 (30.1-47.7) Ma proposed byBloom and Lovejoy (2017).However, all three of these estimates roughly coincide with the age of Miocene marine incursions and the Pebas wetlands, and the error estimate for the age proposed here (21 to 32 Ma) overlaps with these earlier estimates. Our age estimates for the Potamotrygoninae origin contrasts with older ages proposed by some authors based on fossil evidence.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…We used four different dating priors in the BEAST2 analysis. We used the earliest-known proposed fossil for the potamotrygonine subfamily, Potamotrygon ucayalensis (Adnet et al, 2014) from the middle Eocene (∼41 Ma), and the fossils of P. contamanensis, P. canaanorum and P. rajachloeae (Chabain et al, 2017) from the late Oligocene-early Miocene (∼30-20 Ma). We assigned a log-normal distributed prior for the origin of the subfamily Potamotrygoninae using these fossils, and to accommodate date uncertainty, set this prior to have an offset of 20.0, standard deviation (S) of 0.75 and mean (M) of 12.0.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysis and Dating Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…South American fossils of this subfamily drew particular attention this last decade (e.g. Brito and Deynat, 2004;Adnet et al, 2014;Chabain et al, 2017) with evidences that they were abundant in middle Eocene deposits of Peruvian Amazonia. In contrast, the living styracurines (amphi-American whipray) are less abundant.…”
Section: Fig4 Herementioning
confidence: 99%