1983
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198306000-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cementless Fixation of ???Isoelastic??? Hip Endoprostheses Manufactured from Plastic Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
3

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of a cementless "isoelastic" hip stem was reportedly conceived in 1967 by Robert Mathys as an alternative to the cemented metallic hip implant design developed by Sir John Charnley [155,156]. The isoelastic hip stem was intended to replicate the stiffness to the femur, to reduce stress shielding and improve implant fixation.…”
Section: Femoral Stemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The concept of a cementless "isoelastic" hip stem was reportedly conceived in 1967 by Robert Mathys as an alternative to the cemented metallic hip implant design developed by Sir John Charnley [155,156]. The isoelastic hip stem was intended to replicate the stiffness to the femur, to reduce stress shielding and improve implant fixation.…”
Section: Femoral Stemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This device was inserted without cement, and used a proximal lag screw for fixation. Loosening of this prosthesis, attributed to poor clinical technique and excessive proximal micromotion, also led to a second, and ultimately a third generation of the RM Isoelastic Cementless Hip Prosthesis (RMI) [155,156]. These subsequent generations differed in geometric design, but retained the same polyacetal copolymer fixation interface.…”
Section: Femoral Stemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rate of infection related to surgery is affected by many variables: the presence of underlying disease, the type of surgery, the duration of the operation, previous surgery or infection at the site, surgical technique, and the composition of the material implanted. The rate of infection for first-time implantation of an artificial hip is generally less than 2% (18,19,33,40), while knee replacement is reported to carry a <0.6 to 11% risk of infection, depending upon the type of implant (48,49).…”
Section: Orthopedic Prosthesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, materials of substantially lower elastic modulus may be desirable in the design of uncemented femoral components [21].…”
Section: Femoral Component Design In Hip Arthroplastymentioning
confidence: 99%