Cementitious nanocomposites engineered with high-oxidized graphene oxide: Spotting the nano to macro correlation

An Insight into Durability, Electrical Properties and Thermal Behavior of Cementitious Materials Engineered with Graphene Oxide: Does the Oxidation Degree Matter?

“…It is worth mentioning that for common GO dosages (i.e., 0.02–0.04% by weight of cement), the dispersion of the nanofiller cannot be unambiguously assessed by SEM mainly due to the low content and the poor contrast between the nanofiller and the hydrate cement phase. In fact, according to the literature, large GO agglomerates have been detected only in sample 0.55GO-0.2 [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Then, regarding the dispersion of GO within a cementitious matrix, the relative improvement of mechanical and physical properties is usually considered reliable feedback that an appropriate dispersion degree has been achieved [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ].…”

“…Graphene oxide free-flowing nanopowder ( GO ) (Sigma-Aldrich, Milano, Italy) and Graphene oxide water suspension ( GONan ) (GONan, Nanesa, Roma, Italy) were employed. A systematic characterization of the two nanofillers, having fully comparable morphology, size and aspect ratio, has been previously reported [ 13 , 14 ]. The characterization of the two GOs by infra-red and Raman spectroscopy also indicates the presence in both nanofillers of the same oxygen-containing functional groups (i.e., hydroxyl, carbonyl, carboxyl and epoxide groups) and a higher number of defects and oxygen content in GONan with respect to GO [ 13 , 14 ].…”

“…For nanocomposite samples, the as-received (i.e., GONan ) or prepared (i.e., GO ) aqueous suspension was previously added, and the “contained” water computed within the total requested amount. All the details on the experimental procedures of sample preparation and characterization techniques of both fresh mixtures and hardened samples have been reported in previous research by Chougan M. et al [ 13 , 14 ]. The formulation and the designation of the herein-investigated GO-engineered nanocomposites are presented in Table 2 .…”

“…The formulation and the designation of the herein-investigated GO-engineered nanocomposites are presented in Table 2 . The microstructure of all the GO-engineered mortars ( Table 2 ) was previously investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [ 13 , 14 ]. It is worth mentioning that for common GO dosages (i.e., 0.02–0.04% by weight of cement), the dispersion of the nanofiller cannot be unambiguously assessed by SEM mainly due to the low content and the poor contrast between the nanofiller and the hydrate cement phase.…”

“…From this perspective, the aim of this investigation is to contribute to the knowledge of durability and electrical and thermal behavior of GONS-modified cementitious materials [ 9 ] with a particular focus on the impact of the oxidation degree on these properties. For this purpose, two commercially available GONSs characterized by 0.55 and 0.45 oxidation degrees were employed [ 13 , 14 ]. The dosage ranged between 0.01% (by weight of cement), considered an extra-low value, and 0.2% (by weight of cement).…”