2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10266-010-0121-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cemental tear on a mandibular second molar: a case report

Abstract: A cemental tear is a special kind of root fracture that may cause rapid and localized periodontal destruction. Most cemental tears have been reported on bicuspids and incisors. Here we present a case of cemental tears on both the right mandibular first and second molars. The patient was a 72-year-old man who showed gingival swelling and a deep pocket over his right mandibular second molar as well as a deep periodontal pocket on the distolingual aspect of the first molar. During exploratory flap surgery, a deta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MCTS registered teeth were classified as highly suspicious of cemental tears between May 1987 and October 2008 based on one of the following criteria: (1) a discernable radiopacity of separated root structure with a concomitant loss of adjacent periodontal or periapical bone on preoperative radiographs (Figs. 1 and 2) (3, 6); (2) teeth had clinical signs and symptoms and/or persistent periapical radiolucency even after endodontic treatment or retreatment, with or without the presence of suspected radiopaque cementum-like structure (3); and (3) teeth had recurrent periodontal inflammation and/or periodontal bone destruction even after scaling, root planing and curettage, or surgical intervention, with or without a suspicious radiopacity that separated root structure on preoperative radiographs (6). In the MCTS, the structured dental chart for each tooth with a possible cemental tear was designed to record the potential predisposing factors and clinical characteristics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The MCTS registered teeth were classified as highly suspicious of cemental tears between May 1987 and October 2008 based on one of the following criteria: (1) a discernable radiopacity of separated root structure with a concomitant loss of adjacent periodontal or periapical bone on preoperative radiographs (Figs. 1 and 2) (3, 6); (2) teeth had clinical signs and symptoms and/or persistent periapical radiolucency even after endodontic treatment or retreatment, with or without the presence of suspected radiopaque cementum-like structure (3); and (3) teeth had recurrent periodontal inflammation and/or periodontal bone destruction even after scaling, root planing and curettage, or surgical intervention, with or without a suspicious radiopacity that separated root structure on preoperative radiographs (6). In the MCTS, the structured dental chart for each tooth with a possible cemental tear was designed to record the potential predisposing factors and clinical characteristics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, cemental tears are suggested to be a factor for periodontal or periapical tissue destruction (1)(2)(3). The cemental tear-associated lesion often presents itself on the radiograph as a periapical lesion or a periodontal lesion with angular bone loss along the root surface with variable extension, resulting in a deep probing defect because of attachment loss in some cases (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). To rule out the presence of an endodontic-periodontal lesion, the standard of care requires pulp vitality tests and careful radiographic examination to aid in the diagnosis and treatment options.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The cervical type has been described as a periodontal lesion that enables microorganisms to proliferate and initiate active periodontal breakdown 1,2 . There have been a few reports 2,3,5‐12 concerning cemental tears; however, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, reports on tears on autogenous teeth have been conspicuous by their absence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%