“…The fit between this wear pattern and real age (cementum annuli) is acceptable (r2 = 0.797) and similar to those obtained by other authors (r2 = 0.740, N = 65 in Capreolus capreolus, Ashby & Henry, 1979; r2 = 0.656-0.828, N = 57, N = 27 in Rangijer tarandus, Skogland, 1988;r2 = 0.66, N = 199 in Odocoileus virginianus, DeYoung, 1989). However, the tooth wear method is a poorer age estimator than are horn segments, a method often used in bovids (r2 = 0.999, N = 202 in American sheep, Turner, 1977;r2 = 0975, N = 13 in Rupicapra pyrenaica ornata, Bargagli & Lovari, 1984).…”