2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-021-03779-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellulose dissolution in aqueous NaOH–ZnO: effect of pulp pretreatment at macro and molecular levels

Abstract: This paper discusses the effect of hydrolytic pretreatments on pulp dissolution in the aqueous NaOH–ZnO solvent system. Eight samples were studied. They consisted of a never-dried softwood kraft pulp that was hydrolyzed under seven different conditions as well as the pulp without hydrolysis as a reference. The dissolution of the pulps was evaluated both at the macro level as well as at the molecular level based on their reactivity with 4-acetamido-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxo-piperidium (4-AcNH-TEMPO+).… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed that a minimum of 1 wt% ZnO was deemed necessary for the complete solubilization of up to 9 wt% BSG. This observation was surprising when considering the previous studies done on the solubilization of pure cellulose 62,63 in which ZnO is described as an additive that does not directly intervene in the cellulose solubilization mechanism, but rather prevents the spontaneous gelation of solubilized polysaccharides. Moreover, these studies also stated that above 0.5 wt%, the additive reportedly has no further desirable effects and precipitates, contrasting what we observed with our more complex matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Our results showed that a minimum of 1 wt% ZnO was deemed necessary for the complete solubilization of up to 9 wt% BSG. This observation was surprising when considering the previous studies done on the solubilization of pure cellulose 62,63 in which ZnO is described as an additive that does not directly intervene in the cellulose solubilization mechanism, but rather prevents the spontaneous gelation of solubilized polysaccharides. Moreover, these studies also stated that above 0.5 wt%, the additive reportedly has no further desirable effects and precipitates, contrasting what we observed with our more complex matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Cellulose has a strong affinity for itself and hydroxyl-containing materials such as water (Khazraji and Robert, 2013). Cellulose exhibits amphiphilic properties, due to its extensive intra and inter molecular hydrogen bonds and simultaneous hydrophobic molecular interactions, which can significantly impact its solubility in water and most organic solvents (Väisänen et al, 2021b).…”
Section: Key Chemical Properties Of Cellulosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, filter paper consists of purified cellulose with a DP of 2900 (Malešič et al, 2005), whilst birch and dissolving pulps have DPs of 1800 and 3600, respectively (Sirviö and Lakovaara, 2021). However, the typically high DP of cellulose is a major obstacle to its chemical breakdown (Väisänen et al, 2021b).…”
Section: Key Chemical Properties Of Cellulosementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S2, Supplementary data). The latter approach implies to use of specific solvents like N-methyl morpholine-N-oxide (NMMO) (Jedvert & Heinze, 2017;Wang et al, 2016), aqueous solutions combined with ZnO, urea and/or thiourea (Chen et al, 2007;Li et al, 2015;Luo & Zhang, 2013;Väisänen et al, 2021), lithium chloride solution in N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc/LiCl) (Hong et al, 1998;Matsumoto et al, 2001;C. Zhang et al, 2014), ammonia/ammonium thiocyanate (NH 3 /NH 4 SCN) (Cuculo et al, 1994), dimethyl sulfoxide/ tetrabutylammonium fluoride (DMSO/TBAF) (Köhler & Heinze, 2007;Wang et al, 2016), dimethyl sulfoxide/benzyl trimethylammonium J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f fluoride (DMSO/BTMAF) (Köhler & Heinze, 2007), molten inorganic salt hydrates (e.g., LiClO 4 •3H 2 O) Fischer & Thümmler, 2010;Leipner et al, 2000); second generation ionic liquids (Mohd et al, 2017;Morais et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2012;Xu & Wang, 2020), among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%