2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.10.220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellulose-based materials and their adsorptive removal efficiency for dyes: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, several techniques, which allow removing the dyes from water, have been successfully applied, including coagulation, 8 advanced oxidation, 9 and biochemical degradation, 11 but the most promising method is adsorption due to its high efficiency, moderated operating costs, simple operation process, ability to treat concentrated forms of the dyes, and the possibility of adsorbent regeneration. 4,7,12 In fact, many dye-absorbing materials have been already reported in the literature, including biomass-derived activated carbons, 13−19 cellulose-based materials, 20,21 natural and chemically modified zeolites, 22−24 as well as magnetically active nanomaterials. 13,15,16,25−27 Among them, iron-based nanostructures are very attractive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So far, several techniques, which allow removing the dyes from water, have been successfully applied, including coagulation, 8 advanced oxidation, 9 and biochemical degradation, 11 but the most promising method is adsorption due to its high efficiency, moderated operating costs, simple operation process, ability to treat concentrated forms of the dyes, and the possibility of adsorbent regeneration. 4,7,12 In fact, many dye-absorbing materials have been already reported in the literature, including biomass-derived activated carbons, 13−19 cellulose-based materials, 20,21 natural and chemically modified zeolites, 22−24 as well as magnetically active nanomaterials. 13,15,16,25−27 Among them, iron-based nanostructures are very attractive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, several techniques, which allow removing the dyes from water, have been successfully applied, including coagulation, advanced oxidation, membrane separation, and biochemical degradation, but the most promising method is adsorption due to its high efficiency, moderated operating costs, simple operation process, ability to treat concentrated forms of the dyes, and the possibility of adsorbent regeneration. ,, In fact, many dye-absorbing materials have been already reported in the literature, including biomass-derived activated carbons, cellulose-based materials, , natural and chemically modified zeolites, as well as magnetically active nanomaterials. ,,, Among them, iron-based nanostructures are very attractive. This is associated with the abundance of iron and its compounds on the Earth, nontoxicity of iron compounds, as well as unique chemical, physical, and mechanical properties resulting from their high surface-to-volume ratios. , It is also worth noting that iron can appear in various valence states, i.e., Fe 0 , Fe 2+ , and Fe 3+ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discovery of perfect water treatment methods is still a challenge for scientists, while industrialization and urbanization have a signicant impact on living beings. [1][2][3] Azo dyes containing the -N]Nfunctional group are commonly utilized in the food processing, textile, and pharmaceutical industries. The release of these compounds into the environment causes water pollution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, numerous adsorbents have been synthesized and modified for the adsorptive removal of organic dyes. Research findings have shown that various adsorbents such as bio-adsorbents, carbon-based materials, polymer-based materials, metal oxides, metal metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and covalent organic frameworks (COFs) have been used to remove dyes from wastewater (Adegoke et al, 2022;Bilal et al, 2022;Dutta et al, 2021;Kausar et al, 2023;Lan et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%