Cellular toxicities of gadolinium‐based contrast agents used in magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

Contrast agents have been used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a radiological method. Gadolinium‐based contrast agents (GBCAs), because of their paramagnetic characteristics, are the ones mostly used in MRI to increase signal intensity. However, the use of contrast media has raised concerns on cellular toxic risks of these agents. Studies showed the accumulation of gadolinium after injection to humans with or without renal impairment. Also, there are findings obtained under in vitro and/or in vivo conditions that revealed conflicting results for their cytotoxic and genotoxic effects. Some of them declared damage in cells and genetic material; some others did not. Abnormal cell growth and genetic aberration are critical because they may lead to carcinogenesis in somatic cells or may be transferred to the next generations through germ cells. Therefore, understanding the effect of GBCAs on cells is important for their safer usage in clinical administrations to generate high‐quality contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance images. Because of all these reasons, cellular toxicities—mainly genotoxic and cytotoxic effects—of GBCAs were reviewed in this paper.

PROTAC EZH2 degrader-1 overcomes the resistance of podophyllotoxin derivatives in refractory small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis

“…Compared to contrast-enhanced resonance imaging (CE-MRI), BLI can simultaneously scan multiple mice, reducing the potential for errors in efficacy experiments between groups. Additionally, D-luciferin, which is injected for in vivo imaging, does not affect tumour growth and is non-toxic [ 29 ], while the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents in CE-MRI may pose potential risks [ 30 ]. Compared with the previously reported LM models using intraventricular [ 31 ] and intrathecal injection [ 32 – 35 ], our LM model more accurately simulated pathological process of leptomeningeal metastasis while also minimizing harm to animals.…”

Gold Polymer Nanomaterials: A Promising Approach for Enhanced Biomolecular Imaging

“…To acquire MRI images, contrast enhancement agents containing gadolinium have been widely utilized due to their high paramagnetic nature 121 , 122 . However, these agents have been associated with reported toxicity by several researchers 123 , 124 . While Superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIOs) has been utilized for specific tissue imaging studies, it has been noted that these SPIOs can generate reactive oxygen species, leading to tissue damage 125 , 126 .…”

The magnetopyroelectric effect: heat-mediated magnetoelectricity in magnetic nanoparticle-ferroelectric polymer composites

“…However, triggering the magnetocaloric effect usually requires large magnetic fields -on the order of 1 to 5 T -and the library of magnetocaloric materials is mainly limited to Gd-based alloys, which are toxic in their nonchelated state. [21][22][23] In contrast, magnetic nanoparticles, when exposed to an alternating magnetic field, can generate heat through Ne ´el and/or Brown relaxation, which involves the rapid reorientation of their magnetic moments in response to the magnetic field. One of the main advantages of using magnetic nanoparticles for heating is the vast availability of materials and shapes, along with the ability to use low-magnitude magnetic fields.…”