2002
DOI: 10.1002/1521-4141(200201)32:1<39::aid-immu39>3.0.co;2-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular responses to murine CD40 in a mouse B cell line may be TRAF dependent or independent

Abstract: Engagement of CD40 by its ligand induces IKK and mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation and transcriptional activation, leading to activation and differentiation of B cells. These events are most likely transduced by adaptor molecules that are recruited to the CD40 cytoplasmic domain, called TNF receptor‐associated factors (TRAF). We have engineered a chimeric CD40 molecule using the human extracellular sequence and the murine cytoplasmic domain to assess the contribution that specific TRAF bi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
2
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(54 reference statements)
2
45
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The same differences were observed up to 60 min after stimulation (data not shown). Thus, the impact of each TRAF binding site mutation on biochemical signaling by CD40 in BMDC did not simply reflect a delay in the kinetics of activation, as previously reported to occur after CD40 engagement in a murine B cell line [37].…”
Section: The Traf6 Binding Site Is Critical For Jnk and P38 Signalingmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same differences were observed up to 60 min after stimulation (data not shown). Thus, the impact of each TRAF binding site mutation on biochemical signaling by CD40 in BMDC did not simply reflect a delay in the kinetics of activation, as previously reported to occur after CD40 engagement in a murine B cell line [37].…”
Section: The Traf6 Binding Site Is Critical For Jnk and P38 Signalingmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Disruption of both TRAF binding sites ( ¿ T2/3/6 hCD40) resulted in further loss of receptor activity, suggesting that both domains make significant contributions to CD40 signaling leading to BMDC maturation. The decreased receptor activity in the double as compared to each single mutant supports biochemical evidence that the two TRAF binding sites function in an independent rather than a fully cooperative manner [31,37]. Based on these findings, subsequent experiments utilizing the CD154-transfected cell line were performed in the presence of neutralizing anti-CD154 antibody.…”
Section: Both Traf Binding Domains Of Cd40 Contribute To DC Maturatiomentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Even though the signaling pathways of activation of CD40 in thyrocytes have not yet been examined, these can be postulated based on data from studies of activation of necrosis factor kappa B (NFkB) by transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-b) in Graves' thyrocytes, 49 as well as of CD40 signaling in other cell types. [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] According to our intrinsic hypothesis, CD40 ligand more readily activates CD40, overexpressed on the surface of thyrocytes in individuals harboring the CC genotype. Once activated, CD40 receptors multimerize, recruiting TNF-receptor associated factors (TRAFs) to their cytoplasmic tails.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Downstream of the initial receptor ligation, TRAFs recruit and activate kinases such as inhibitor of k-B (IkB) kinase (IKK), leading to activation of NFkB pathway. NFkB is able to turn on transcription of a number of genes including cytokines, chemokines and adhesion molecules, which could augment thyroidal inflammation [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] (Figure 4b). Moreover, activation of the CD40 pathway has been shown to activate anti-apoptotic pathways in several non-lympho- The intrinsic thyroidal CD40 model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 Binding of TRAF2 and -3 to CD40 has indeed been shown to be required for ligand-induced downmodulation of this receptor, possibly by TRAF2-dependent recruitment to lipid rafts and subsequent TRAF3-dependent receptor internalization. 52 Binding to TRAF2 and TRAF3 has been reported not only for MC159 but also for the long form of cellular FLIP, c-FLIP L , under conditions of overexpression, 53,54 and increased recruitment of TRAF2 to the Fas DISC was observed in Jurkat and Raji cells upon stable transfection with cFLIP L . 53 While this suggests that both MC159 and cFLIP L interfere with the function of TRAF2, it is unclear whether c-FLIP L also recruits endogenous TRAF3 to the DISC and if so, whether this has a similar or rather an opposing impact on TRAF2 and TRAF3 function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%