2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.20.549801
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular proliferation biases clonal lineage tracing and trajectory inference

Abstract: We identify a fundamental statistical phenomenon in single-cell time courses with clone-based lineage tracing. Through simple probabilistic arguments, we show how the relative growth rates of cells influence the probability that they will be sampled in clones observed across multiple time points. We support these arguments with a simple simulation study and a time-course of T-cell development, and we demonstrate that this bias can impact fate probability predictions from trajectory inference methods. Finally, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S6). CoSpar may be prone to sampling bias due to differences in cellular growth rates 62 . LineageOT does not use multi-time clone information directly (it only uses clonal relationships within time-points) and it relies on estimates of cell growth rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…S6). CoSpar may be prone to sampling bias due to differences in cellular growth rates 62 . LineageOT does not use multi-time clone information directly (it only uses clonal relationships within time-points) and it relies on estimates of cell growth rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore utilized experimental measurements of cell growth rates (see methods), and used a modified version of LineageOT that incorporate multi-time data - a method called Multi-Time LOT (MT-LOT) (see methods and Bonham-Carter et al 62 ). The results from MT-LOT reflect a midpoint between the previous predictions from CoSpar and LOT and we proceeded using this experimentally-supported inference method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation