2019
DOI: 10.1002/dvg.23271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular organization and boundary formation in craniofacial development

Abstract: Summary Craniofacial morphogenesis is a highly dynamic process that requires changes in the behaviors and physical properties of cells in order to achieve the proper organization of different craniofacial structures. Boundary formation is a critical process in cellular organization, patterning, and ultimately tissue separation. There are several recurring cellular mechanisms through which boundary formation and cellular organization occur including, transcriptional patterning, cell segregation, cell adhesion a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 169 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We demonstrate that MES cells do not migrate as a sheet, but instead exhibit fascinating and unique patterns of epithelial cell movement, prompting several fundamental questions: 1) How are initial holes in the MES established? This does not require apoptosis, but could instead involve mesenchymal cells pushing through the MES or in a cell-sorting-like behavior driven by differences in cell adhesion or actomyosin contractility between epithelial and mesenchymal cells (Kindberg and Bush, 2019;Lough et al, 2017). Matrix metalloproteinases are induced by TGFβ3 in the MES and required for secondary palate fusion (Blavier et al, 2001), suggesting a role in the initiation of MES breakage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We demonstrate that MES cells do not migrate as a sheet, but instead exhibit fascinating and unique patterns of epithelial cell movement, prompting several fundamental questions: 1) How are initial holes in the MES established? This does not require apoptosis, but could instead involve mesenchymal cells pushing through the MES or in a cell-sorting-like behavior driven by differences in cell adhesion or actomyosin contractility between epithelial and mesenchymal cells (Kindberg and Bush, 2019;Lough et al, 2017). Matrix metalloproteinases are induced by TGFβ3 in the MES and required for secondary palate fusion (Blavier et al, 2001), suggesting a role in the initiation of MES breakage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the introduction of WGS in the molecular diagnostics of FDs requires advanced in silico and functional analyses, which are both necessary for the interpretation and proving of pathogenicity of genomic alterations ( Smedley et al, 2016 ; Bodea et al, 2018 ; Posey, 2019 ). The proportion of molecularly undiagnosed patients, however, clearly suggests that some of the genetic lesions, causative for FDs, lie within non-coding DNA, and could be picked up only by WGS ( Kindberg and Bush, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to cell mixing in the suture mesenchyme, loss of Twist1 widens Msx2 expression distribution and osteogenic differentiation [ 10 , 90 , 114 ]. Loss of Twist1 also reduces the levels of ephrin receptor EphA4 and ephrin ligands ephrin-A2 ( Efna2) and ephrin-A4 ( Efna4 ), all of which are components of the eph/ephrin signaling pathway that is crucial for tissue boundary formation in vertebrates [ 10 , 85 , 171 ]. Reduced dosage of Msx2 in Twist1 +/− mice can rescue the coronal suture boundary defect to a wild type pattern [ 10 ].…”
Section: Mechanisms Underlying Coronal Craniosynostosismentioning
confidence: 99%