2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular morphological features are predictive markers of cancer cell state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the presented experimental data, an assessment of β-HCH’s capability to modulate cellular structural plasticity could provide a further element to confirm its carcinogenic potential. Cytoskeletal organization can, in fact, adapt in response to oncogenic stimuli, determining a change in cellular morphology that is aimed at fostering proliferation activity and invasiveness [ 28 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the presented experimental data, an assessment of β-HCH’s capability to modulate cellular structural plasticity could provide a further element to confirm its carcinogenic potential. Cytoskeletal organization can, in fact, adapt in response to oncogenic stimuli, determining a change in cellular morphology that is aimed at fostering proliferation activity and invasiveness [ 28 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this work represents a significant advance in characterizing cell adaptation to tissue microenvironments, several limitations of the current approach must be considered. First, while morphology serves as a powerful functional output for cell state, it is a conglomerate of many mechanical [18, 61, 62], biochemical [13, 14], and stochastic [63] processes and therefore cannot inform on the specific pathways regulating cell behaviors such as plasticity. For a deeper understanding of the observed tissue-dependent cell differences we will now have to introduce molecularly-specific probes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this work represents a significant advancement in characterization of cell adaptation as a function of tissue microenvironments, several limitations of the current approach must be considered. First, while morphology serves as a powerful functional output for cell state, it is by nature a conglomerate of many mechanical [18,65,66], biochemical [13,14], and cell-intrinsic [11,67] cues and therefore cannot inform on the specific biochemical pathways regulating signaling. Therefore, correlating specific morphological states to organization of mechanical and biochemical signaling pathways at single-cell resolution will allow triangulation of cell states for a deeper understanding of tissue-dependent cell differences.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accurate and sensitive diagnosis of pathologies is an essential determinant of patient treatment outcome and prognosis. Given that cell morphology, structure, and chemical composition are linked to physiological function, they can be used as essential markers for diagnosis ( Alizadeh et al., 2020 ). Among such markers, morphology is still the most important criterion for diagnosis and also constitutes a more resource-effective alternative to molecular diagnosis approaches if two conditions are met: (1) morphological patterns are available for accurate and sensitive diagnosis and (2) these patterns can be efficiently and (ideally) automatically evaluated ( Bain, 2005 ; Ford, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%