1989
DOI: 10.1016/0303-7207(89)90184-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular mechanisms in the processing of growth hormone and its receptor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, two patients had received the highest dose of GHRH(1-29)NH 2 prior to the lower dose which could have had a priming effect, although the Latin-squares design of this study would have randomized for this and the time interval between studies makes such an effect unlikely in normal GH replete individuals. At a cellular level, the GHRH receptor is G-protein linked (26) and should not experience the inhibition seen at high ligand concentrations in vitro with receptors that require dimerization (27). There is no evidence that mobilization of stored GH pools is reduced by higher concentrations of GHRH and in vivo studies of cultured somatotropes have shown typical dose-response curves (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, two patients had received the highest dose of GHRH(1-29)NH 2 prior to the lower dose which could have had a priming effect, although the Latin-squares design of this study would have randomized for this and the time interval between studies makes such an effect unlikely in normal GH replete individuals. At a cellular level, the GHRH receptor is G-protein linked (26) and should not experience the inhibition seen at high ligand concentrations in vitro with receptors that require dimerization (27). There is no evidence that mobilization of stored GH pools is reduced by higher concentrations of GHRH and in vivo studies of cultured somatotropes have shown typical dose-response curves (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the adaptation of GH-receptor cycling to GH pulses applied less frequently than in vivo (e.g., two or four GH pulses per day) would not pose a problem under a ligand-driven receptor internalization model, hepatocytes may be unable to respond to GH pulses that recur more frequently than the endogenous male rhythm. Conceivably, in the seven-pulse-per-day experiments described in this report, the interpulse interval may be shorter than the minimum time needed for reappearance of unoccupied GH receptor at the cell surface, a process that probably requires new receptor-protein synthesis (38).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sequence of events strongly suggests that the reduction in the number of surface receptors resulted from inhibition of translocation. The lag time between onset of inhibition of GHR translocation and surface GH binding is likely to reflect the time it takes the receptors to be removed from the cell surface by internalization, which occurs constitutively (26), and before the decrease in GH binding becomes detectable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GH binding assay with cell monolayers has been described previously (8). Briefly, recombinant human GH (9) was radiolabeled with Na 125 I (ARI, Sydney, Australia) by the Iodogen (Pierce) method to a specific activity of [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Monolayer cultures at a density of 4 ϫ 10 4 cells͞cm 2 were set up in 6-well plates (Flow Laboratories) and treated with insulin or IGF-I.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%