2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular labeling of endogenous retrovirus replication (CLEVR) reveals de novo insertions of the gypsy retrotransposable element in cell culture and in both neurons and glial cells of aging fruit flies

Abstract: Evidence is rapidly mounting that transposable element (TE) expression and replication may impact biology more widely than previously thought. This includes potential effects on normal physiology of somatic tissues and dysfunctional impacts in diseases associated with aging, such as cancer and neurodegeneration. Investigation of the biological impact of mobile elements in somatic cells will be greatly facilitated by the use of donor elements that are engineered to report de novo events in vivo. In multicellula… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
62
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(118 reference statements)
8
62
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the observations from constitutive nls-LacZ expression described above ( Figure S1), there is a gradual age-dependent increase (from days 2 to 5 post-induction) in numbers of gypsy-CLEVR-labeled glia with post-development induction of nls-LacZ (repo ts > nls-LacZ+gypsy-CLEVR) ( Figures 1D, 1E, and S2A). The age-dependent increase of gypsy ERV expression and replication is also consistent with our prior reports for neural tissue [32,36,40] and similar studies of other tissues [41][42][43][44]. In contrast with this gradual and modest increase in the number of gypsy-CLEVR-labeled glia with induced expression of nls-LacZ, we detected a dramatic increase in the numbers of glia labeled with this same reporter in response to induction of hTDP-43 ( Figures 1D, 1E, and S2A).…”
Section: Glial Expression Of Htdp-43 Leads To Gypsy Erv Replication supporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with the observations from constitutive nls-LacZ expression described above ( Figure S1), there is a gradual age-dependent increase (from days 2 to 5 post-induction) in numbers of gypsy-CLEVR-labeled glia with post-development induction of nls-LacZ (repo ts > nls-LacZ+gypsy-CLEVR) ( Figures 1D, 1E, and S2A). The age-dependent increase of gypsy ERV expression and replication is also consistent with our prior reports for neural tissue [32,36,40] and similar studies of other tissues [41][42][43][44]. In contrast with this gradual and modest increase in the number of gypsy-CLEVR-labeled glia with induced expression of nls-LacZ, we detected a dramatic increase in the numbers of glia labeled with this same reporter in response to induction of hTDP-43 ( Figures 1D, 1E, and S2A).…”
Section: Glial Expression Of Htdp-43 Leads To Gypsy Erv Replication supporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the presence of pan-glial hTDP43 expression (repo > hTDP-43+gypsy-CLEVR), by contrast, we observed a striking increase in the number of H2B-mCherrylabeled glia either at 2 or 5-7 days post-eclosion ( Figure S1). This gypsy-CLEVR reporter expression was reduced in glia when we used an RNAi transgene (gypsy-IR) targeting gypsy transcripts to disrupt gypsy ERV expression [32,36,38], consistent with the conclusion that the appearance of the H2B-mCherry label was dependent upon prior gypsy expression (Figure S1; see also [36]). A small decrease in total number of glia was detected in these pan-glial hTDP-43-expressing animals (repo>hTDP-43) at day 2, consistent with the possibility that constitutive expression of hTDP-43 throughout development might impact glial differentiation or survival ( Figure S4B).…”
Section: Glial Expression Of Htdp-43 Leads To Gypsy Erv Replication supporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nonetheless, evidence for active somatic transposition has been recently mounting. Reporters of transposon activity suggested TE mobility in neuronal lineages in human, mouse and Drosophila (Muotri et al 2005;Coufal et al 2009;Li et al 2013;Macia et al 2017;Chang et al 2019). Additionally, recent use of an engineered gypsy retrotransposon trapping cassette in flies suggested that somatic transposition could also occur in non-neuronal tissues such as the fat body (Jones et al 2016; or the intestine (Sousa-Victor et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%