2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2007.00418_15.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular interaction and retrotransposition of porcine endogenous retrovirus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) show different copy numbers in different organs, indicating that they are active [5][6][7][8]. Moreover, ERVs do not lose their retrotransposition ability; this was also shown for other ERV [9], in a study that showed a frequency of retrotransposition of up to 1.2 × 10 −6 for PERV and 5 × 10 −7 for MoMLV per cell per generation in single experiments, indicating that a PERV retrotransposition happens more than twice as often as a MoMLV retrotransposition. Our previous findings indicate that ERV6A and ERV6B, which possess the gag, pol, and env domains, represent the most recently classified family with potential transposable activity [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) show different copy numbers in different organs, indicating that they are active [5][6][7][8]. Moreover, ERVs do not lose their retrotransposition ability; this was also shown for other ERV [9], in a study that showed a frequency of retrotransposition of up to 1.2 × 10 −6 for PERV and 5 × 10 −7 for MoMLV per cell per generation in single experiments, indicating that a PERV retrotransposition happens more than twice as often as a MoMLV retrotransposition. Our previous findings indicate that ERV6A and ERV6B, which possess the gag, pol, and env domains, represent the most recently classified family with potential transposable activity [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Another international symposium on xenotransplantation was held in Berlin, Germany, in June 2007. There were contributions by Reichart [18], Vallabhapurapu et al [19], Cooper [20], Kra¨mer [21], Hering [22], Ulrichs [23], Cozzi et al [24], Schuurman [25], Petersen et al [26], Plege et al [27], Kessler et al [28], Burdorf et al [29], Jungmann et al [30], Siepert et al [31], and Dieckhoff et al [32] on present status and knowledge of various fields related to xenotransplantation, from stem cells to risk assessment related to xenozoonosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%