2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.11.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular and mitochondrial determination of low molecular mass organic acids by LC–MS/MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to previous reports[46], fecal SCFA was measured by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry after derivatization reaction. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was employed to quantify the levels of other organic acids, i.e ., lactate, pyruvate, and fumarate, as described previously[47].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to previous reports[46], fecal SCFA was measured by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry after derivatization reaction. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was employed to quantify the levels of other organic acids, i.e ., lactate, pyruvate, and fumarate, as described previously[47].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 However, these methods are time-consuming and reported in 13 to 75 min cycle times. 24,25 In regards of urinary organic acid profiles, the limit of detection, range and accuracy of our approach were good for routine laboratory practice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The LOD and linearity range of HA were lower than those of reported methods [31, 32]. In addition, the linearity ranges and LODs of CA, MA, and SU were comparable or even lower than those of using HPLC–MS or colorimetric enzymatic methods [33, 34]. More importantly, the 2D analysis by HPLC–ESI–IMS substantially attenuates the interferences from crops, and therefore shows higher selectivity and easier manipulation relative to the reported methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%