CellSNAP: a fast, accurate algorithm for 3D cell segmentation in quantitative phase imaging

Abstract

. Significance Three-dimensional quantitative phase imaging (QPI) has rapidly emerged as a complementary tool to fluorescence imaging, as it provides an objective measure of cell morphology and dynamics, free of variability due to contrast agents. It has opened up new directions of investigation by providing systematic and correlative analysis of various cellular parameters without limitations of photobleaching and phototoxicity. While current QPI systems allow the rapid acquisition of tomographic images, the pipeline to analyze these raw three-dimensional (3D) tomograms is not well-developed. We focus on a critical, yet often underappreciated, step of the analysis pipeline that of 3D cell segmentation from the acquired tomograms. Aim We report the CellSNAP (Cell Segmentation via Novel Algorithm for Phase Imaging) algorithm for the 3D segmentation of QPI images. Approach The cell segmentation algorithm mimics the gemstone extraction process, initiating with a coarse 3D extrusion from a two-dimensional (2D) segmented mask to outline the cell structure. A 2D image is generated, and a segmentation algorithm identifies the boundary in the plane. Leveraging cell continuity in consecutive -stacks, a refined 3D segmentation, akin to fine chiseling in gemstone carving, completes the process. Results The CellSNAP algorithm outstrips the current gold standard in terms of speed, robustness, and implementation, achieving cell segmentation under 2 s per cell on a single-core processor. The implementation of CellSNAP can easily be parallelized on a multi-core system for further speed improvements. For the cases where segmentation is possible with the existing standard method, our algorithm displays an average difference of 5% for dry mass and 8% for volume measurements. We also show that CellSNAP can handle challenging image datasets where cells are clumped and marred by interferogram drifts, which pose major difficulties for all QPI-focused AI-based segmentation tools. Conclusion Our proposed method is less memory intensive and significantly faster than existing methods. The method can be easily implemented on a student laptop. Since the approach is rule-based, there is no need to collect a lot of imaging data and manually annotate them to perform machine learning based training of the model. We envision our work will lead to broader adoption of QPI imaging for high-throughput analysis, which has, in part, been stymied by a lack of suitable image segmentation tools.