2015
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1505.06434
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell-type-specific computational neuroanatomy, simulations from the sagittal and coronal Allen Brain Atlas

Abstract: The Allen Atlas of the adult mouse brain is a brain-wide, genome-wide data set that has been made available online, triggering a renaissance in neuroanatomy. In particular, it has been used to define brain regions in a computational, data-driven way, and to estimate the region-specificity of cell types characterized independently by their transcriptional activity. However, these results were based on one series of co-registered (coronal) ISH image series per gene, whereas the online ABA contains several image … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we estimated the densities of the contribution of each region in the coarsest version of the ARA to the total density of each cell type in the data set. For most cell types, this confirms the ranking of cell types by stability obtained in [4], but based on error bars obtained from the same set of genes in every fitting of the model (see the accompanying preprint [26] for exhaustive results for all cell types in the panel). The most stable results against sub-sampling tend to correspond to cell types for which the anatomical distribution of results is more peaked.…”
Section: Anatomical Analysis Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Moreover, we estimated the densities of the contribution of each region in the coarsest version of the ARA to the total density of each cell type in the data set. For most cell types, this confirms the ranking of cell types by stability obtained in [4], but based on error bars obtained from the same set of genes in every fitting of the model (see the accompanying preprint [26] for exhaustive results for all cell types in the panel). The most stable results against sub-sampling tend to correspond to cell types for which the anatomical distribution of results is more peaked.…”
Section: Anatomical Analysis Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%