2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-020-01879-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell-Type-Specific Analysis of Molecular Pathology in Autism Identifies Common Genes and Pathways Affected Across Neocortical Regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of single-nucleus RNA sequencing in cortical tissues of patients with ASD have found that malfunctioning genes expressed in specific cell types of the neocortex are ideal candidates for the development of ASD-targeted therapies [10]. In a recent study [11], researchers attempted to identify the cell-type-specific changes of genes shared across cortical areas of ASD patients. They found that in three groups of ASD patients, the same 30 genes were upregulated in four cortical regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies of single-nucleus RNA sequencing in cortical tissues of patients with ASD have found that malfunctioning genes expressed in specific cell types of the neocortex are ideal candidates for the development of ASD-targeted therapies [10]. In a recent study [11], researchers attempted to identify the cell-type-specific changes of genes shared across cortical areas of ASD patients. They found that in three groups of ASD patients, the same 30 genes were upregulated in four cortical regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These genes are expressed in adult microglia, astrocytes, and brain endothelial cells. The results showed that activation of astrocytes, microglia, and endothelial cells in the neocortex is a common feature of ASD pathology across multiple cortical regions, and astrocytes and microglia have been shown to regulate the formation and pruning of synapses during development [11]. Although the studies [9,11] have pointed out the cell specificity in the pathogenic factors of ASD, only the relationship between a single gene and ASD has been analyzed in the previous research process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst much progress has recently been made characterizing the convergent transcriptomic mechanisms and signatures which are characteristic of ASDs at the bulk RNA-seq level [ 80 , 81 ], these studies have been limited in their ability to determine the precise cell types affected with high resolution. In an attempt to address this, snRNA-seq of the healthy adult neocortex has recently been used to identify those cell-types that are enriched in the differential gene expression and alternative splicing programmes that are consistently detected by bulk RNA-seq of ASD tissue [ 55 , 82 ]. Specifically, snRNA-seq identified endothelial cells, microglia and astrocytes to be most highly enriched for a set of 27 genes related to immune system response that are consistently differentially expressed across four cortical (frontal and temporal) regions in bulk RNA-seq.…”
Section: Lessons Learnt From Single-cell Transcriptomics In the Mammalian Cnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying the similar methodology to that used in aforementioned ASD studies [ 55 , 82 , 84 , 86 ] these snRNA-seq datasets of human AD tissue have also facilitated important interrogation of cell-subtype specific expression patterns of ~1000 AD-associated GWAS genes [ 112 ]. This unexpectedly revealed that many AD-associated genes display specific expression in microglia to further emphasize the central role of these cells in AD (e.g.…”
Section: Lessons Learnt From Single-cell Transcriptomics In the Mammalian Cnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include the autism GWAS, of which the original signal is weak (no SNP passing genome-wide significance threshold) [26]. Sherlock-II identified 10 genes with FDR<0.1; four of them (ENPP4, MAPT, LEPR, MTHFR) have strong literature support [27][28][29][30] (Figure S1).…”
Section: Translate Snp-phenotype Association Profile To Gene-phenotypmentioning
confidence: 99%