2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell-Surface Proteomic Profiling in the Fly Brain Uncovers Wiring Regulators

Abstract: Highlights d Cell type and temporally resolved cell-surface proteomic profiling in intact brains d Proteome-wide coordinated change of neuronal surface landscape over development d New cell-surface regulators of brain wiring from unexpected molecular families d Cell-autonomous control of dendrite targeting by the lipoprotein receptor LRP1

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
150
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
4
150
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dissecting the molecular composition of specific connections remains a major challenge. Sorting of growth cones 69 and specific synapse types (Pfeffer et al 70 , this study), imaging-based approaches [71][72][73] , affinity purification 74 , and proximity biotinylation [75][76][77] each have their advantages and disadvantages 78 . Here, we combined biochemical enrichment, antibody labeling of a synapse type-enriched surface marker, and fluorescent sorting to isolate MF synapses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dissecting the molecular composition of specific connections remains a major challenge. Sorting of growth cones 69 and specific synapse types (Pfeffer et al 70 , this study), imaging-based approaches [71][72][73] , affinity purification 74 , and proximity biotinylation [75][76][77] each have their advantages and disadvantages 78 . Here, we combined biochemical enrichment, antibody labeling of a synapse type-enriched surface marker, and fluorescent sorting to isolate MF synapses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All six samples were then digested with 0.1 μg Lys-C for 2 hours, followed by a reduction of the urea concentration to <2 M and continued digestion with 0.5 μg trypsin overnight. Reactions were quenched with formic acid at a final concentration of 5% and then desalted by reverse phase C18 stage tips as described previously 87 and dried down. Peptides were then resuspended in 50 μL of 50 mM HEPES buffer and isobarically labeled using 400 μg of Tandem Mass Tag 6-plex (TMT6) isobaric labeling reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific).…”
Section: Rap-ms Protein Digestion and Tmt Labelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The labeling reactions were then quenched with 4 μL of 5% hydroxylamine, samples were mixed together, and dried. The sample was fractionated by SCX stage tip strategy using three pH cuts at 5.15, 8.25, and 10.3 as described previously 87 .…”
Section: Rap-ms Protein Digestion and Tmt Labelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…APEX, a modified ascorbate peroxidase derived from soybean, is a simple to use highly versatile marker for EM detection. The wide applicability of its use is demonstrated by studies utilizing APEX and its derivative, APEX2, for detection of fusion proteins in cells, Drosophila, zebrafish, and mice (Ariotti et al, 2015;Hirabayashi et al, 2018;Li et al, 2020;Meiring et al, 2019). APEX has also been combined with nanobody-based detection systems for rapid localization of GFP-and mCherry-tagged proteins (Ariotti et al, 2015;Ariotti et al, 2018), and used to detect protein interactions using split GFP and nanobodies or using a novel split-APEX system (Ariotti et al, 2018;Han et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%