2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell performance modeling of direct methanol fuel cells using proton-exchange solid electrolytes: Effective reactant diffusion coefficients in porous diffusion layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incorporation of the nanofillers in the QPVA film resulted in physical hindrance, blocking the passage of fuel feed and reducing the alcohol crossover [58,59]. This effect is advantageous for the polymeric electrolyte membrane in improving cell performance of DAMFCs [60].…”
Section: Nanocomposite Membrane Characterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incorporation of the nanofillers in the QPVA film resulted in physical hindrance, blocking the passage of fuel feed and reducing the alcohol crossover [58,59]. This effect is advantageous for the polymeric electrolyte membrane in improving cell performance of DAMFCs [60].…”
Section: Nanocomposite Membrane Characterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modeling of the oxygen diffusion coefficient into the cathode is described in [6] and the details are described in the supplementary information.…”
Section: Cathode Overpotentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DFAFCs facilitates lower crossover flux through the electrolyte membrane than that of methanol, faster electrochemical kinetics due to the smaller molecular size than methanol, and non-toxicity [4]. In addition, it has many advantages, such as a low emission of pollutants, high energy density, and the aptitude to utilize liquid fuel that is more readily stored and transported than hydrogen fuel [5,6]. Moreover, a DFAFC has a higher theoretical cell potential (1.48 V), exhibiting a higher voltage output compared to that in a methanol (1.21 V) and gaseous hydrogen cell (1.23 V), respectively [5,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experimental setup was illustrated in our previous work [42,56,57]. The fuel (1 M, 2 M and 4 M methanol in 6 M KOH) was maintained at a predetermined temperature in a thermostatic chamber and recirculated through the anode using a metering pump at a flow rate of 5 mL·min −1 .…”
Section: Cell Performance Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%