1978
DOI: 10.1017/s0016672300018061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell numbers and cell sizes in organs of mice selected for large and small body size

Abstract: SUMMARYCell numbers in four organs of large, control and small mice were estimated by nuclear counts. Average cell mass was estimated from the cell number and the organ weight. The mice were from the selected Q-strain with six replicate lines in each size-group. The organs were lung, liver, spleen and kidney. At 6 weeks of age the large mice had more cells and larger cells than the controls in all organs; the small mice had fewer and smaller cells than the controls. The regression of log cell-number on log-org… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showing differserved in this experiment relative to those reported by Smith Richards et al (2002). The three QTL found ences in cell number and cell size at different ages have been observed in several selection experiments in mice in this study for intake at specific weekly intervals show, for the first time, age-dependent genomic regulation of (Falconer et al 1978;Atchley et al 2000), including the M16 line (Eisen and Leatherwood 1978).…”
Section: Or Between Lines Divergentlycontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Results showing differserved in this experiment relative to those reported by Smith Richards et al (2002). The three QTL found ences in cell number and cell size at different ages have been observed in several selection experiments in mice in this study for intake at specific weekly intervals show, for the first time, age-dependent genomic regulation of (Falconer et al 1978;Atchley et al 2000), including the M16 line (Eisen and Leatherwood 1978).…”
Section: Or Between Lines Divergentlycontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Thus, it is reasonable to suggest that biphasic size-scaling of metabolism is produced by the joined effects of ontogenetic shifts in energy expenditure for growth and changes in the relative roles of hyperplasia and hypertrophy in ontogenetic growth. Changes in the size and number of cells are also known to underlie responses to selection for growth traits (Medrano and Gall, 1976a;Falconer et al, 1978;Stevenson et al, 1995;Atchley et al, 1997;Atchley et al, 2000;Calboli et al, 2003). Partridge et al (Partridge et al, 1999), for example, demonstrated that lab evolution of larger Drosophila melanogaster proceeded mainly through increasing cell number, and an evolutionary decrease in size was achieved mostly by reduction of cell size.…”
Section: Linking Metabolic Scaling Growth and Cell Size -Future Prosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results favor the view that some part of this variability can be linked to variable growth rates, but we stress that this concept in its original form (sensu Wieser, 1994;RiisgĂ„rd, 1998) overlooks the potential metabolic consequences of cellular processes associated with growth rate changes. Most organisms increase body size mainly through cell proliferation (hyperplasia) during early postembryonic development and thus with relatively little change in average cell size, but later in life mainly by cell growth and/or hypertrophy (Falconer et al, 1978;Atchley et al, 2000;Glazier, 2005). Given that larger cells require less energy per protoplasm volume than smaller cells for maintenance of ion gradients across cell membranes (Davison, 1955;Kozlowski et al, 2003), cellular changes through ontogeny alone should lead to nearly isometric scaling of metabolism early in life and to negative allometry of metabolism later in life, a phenomenon already postulated (Kayser and Heusner, 1964) and quoted (Medrano and Gall, 1976b).…”
Section: Linking Metabolic Scaling Growth and Cell Size -Future Prosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body weight at necropsy is strongly correlated with the target of selection in original lines, the body weight at 60 days (Falconer et al 1978;Vaughn et al 1999). All phenotypic measurements were taken at necropsy and were corrected for the effect of sex, age at necropsy, and litter size (,10 vs. .10) by partialing out the effect of these factors using the general linear model prior to further analysis.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%