2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2015.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell membrane permeabilization by 12-ns electric pulses: Not a purely dielectric, but a charge-dependent phenomenon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(60 reference statements)
1
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously demonstrated that the nanoelectroablation effect could be observed for field strengths greater than 10 kV/cm [25]. By varying the conductivity of the medium, we have confirmed the initial observation by Silve, et al [26, 27] that no significant cell death is observed from nanosecond pulsed electric field application when the current density flowing across the cells is below a threshold level. There is very little cell death in response to 100 pulses, 100 ns long and 10–20 kV/cm when only 0 to 20 A/cm 2 is flowing across the cells.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have previously demonstrated that the nanoelectroablation effect could be observed for field strengths greater than 10 kV/cm [25]. By varying the conductivity of the medium, we have confirmed the initial observation by Silve, et al [26, 27] that no significant cell death is observed from nanosecond pulsed electric field application when the current density flowing across the cells is below a threshold level. There is very little cell death in response to 100 pulses, 100 ns long and 10–20 kV/cm when only 0 to 20 A/cm 2 is flowing across the cells.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…When the current density is reduced to zero by increasing medium resistivity, cell viability increases dramatically to the point where no cells die after exposure to 16 J/mL. This increased viability in low conductivity media is somewhat controversial since some previous reports have observed that for low pulse numbers, the cell viability decreases in low conductivity media [26, 27] Possible explanations of these contradictory observations include: 1) Ionic dependence of membrane charging requirements to generate nanopores; 2) Maxwell stress tensor inducing a stretching force on the membrane that increases in low conductivity or, simply 3) The dependence of membrane properties on medium conductivity [13]. The fact is that these low conductivity solutions are definitely not physiological and can have many effects on cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other study was published recently by our group and indicated an opposite tendency: reversible permeabilization induced by 12-ns pulses of moderate magnitude 3.2 MV/m on DC3-F cells was detected in a medium with an external conductivity of 1.5 S/m and not when the conductivity was lowered to 0.1 S/m 22 . We hypothesized that the longer charging time of the cell’s membrane in a low conductivity medium did not allow sufficient membrane charging in order to trigger permeabilization, as discussed in detail in reference 22 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we present experimental data on extracellular medium conductivity effects during electroporation in the submicrosecond range (100 ns-900 ns) using mouse colon carcinoma MC38/0 cell line as a model. We superposition our data with available studies 10,11 in the nanosecond range using 25 ns pulses of 60 kV/cm. To maximize the consolidation of knowledge and to provide a reference for the described efficacies, we also cover the conventional microsecond range (100 μs × 8) pulses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%