2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66185-8_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell Lineage Tracing in Lens-Free Microscopy Videos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach could be particularly beneficial in the context of cell tracking. There, it is often desirable to have multiple diverse segmentation hypotheses [13,8], which could be achieved by suppressing fewer candidate polygons. Furthermore, StarDist can plausibly complete shapes for partially visible cells at the image boundary, which could make it easier to track cells that enter and leave the field of view over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach could be particularly beneficial in the context of cell tracking. There, it is often desirable to have multiple diverse segmentation hypotheses [13,8], which could be achieved by suppressing fewer candidate polygons. Furthermore, StarDist can plausibly complete shapes for partially visible cells at the image boundary, which could make it easier to track cells that enter and leave the field of view over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, an FCN network with two sibling branches is proposed for simultaneous nucleus detection and classification [54] and the joint learning allows both tasks to benefit from each other. Another FCN-based cell detection method can be found in [55], where it introduces deconvolutional layers to the ResNet [56] such that the output probability map has an identical dimension as the input image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the U-Net is a popular architecture in the recent audio processing literature, to the best of our knowledge, no work in the domain of audio processing compares the U-Net against the well-established baseline of the ResNet. A small number of comparative studies exist in the fields of image processing and medical imaging, in which either the number of parameters of the compared models is not stated [48], or in which the ResNet has significantly fewer parameters than the U-Net [49], [50], [51]. In all these works, the ResNet outperforms the U-Net by a small margin.…”
Section: B Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%