2004
DOI: 10.1039/b311210a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell immersion and cell dipping in microfluidic devicesElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available: cell dipping video sequence from which Fig. 7 was extracted and cell dipping video sequence with close-ups. See http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/lc/b3/b311210a/

Abstract: Combining deflective dielectrophoretic barriers with controlled pressure driven liquid flows in microfluidic devices allows accurate handling of particles such as biological cells in suspensions. Working towards cell-based lab-on-a-chip applications, a platform permitting rapid testing of devices having different dielectrophoretic and fluidic subunits was developed. The performance of such a system is shown in the cases of (A) flooding a small number of immobilised cells with a dye and (B) transient buffer swa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative potential mechanism for separation is dielectrophoresis (DEP), the translational motion of charge-neutral matter caused by polarization effects in nonuniform electric fields (15). Because of the relatively facile engineering of the electric fields and interface to integrated electronics, DEP provides an especially attractive force field for on-chip cell manipulation (16,17).The time-averaged dielectrophoretic force on a homogeneous sphere of radius r p , ignoring higher order effects of polarization, can be approximated as (18)where E rms is the electric field strength, m is the permittivity of the suspending medium, is the angular frequency, and Re( f CM ()) is the real part of the dipolar Clausius-Mossotti (CM) factor. The CM factor is bound by the limits Ϫ0.5 Ͻ Re( f CM ()) Ͻ 1 and describes the relative polarization of the particle versus that of the surrounding medium given by f CM () ϭ (* p () Ϫ * m ())͞(* p () ϩ 2* m ()), where * p and * m are the complex permittivities of the particle and medium, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative potential mechanism for separation is dielectrophoresis (DEP), the translational motion of charge-neutral matter caused by polarization effects in nonuniform electric fields (15). Because of the relatively facile engineering of the electric fields and interface to integrated electronics, DEP provides an especially attractive force field for on-chip cell manipulation (16,17).The time-averaged dielectrophoretic force on a homogeneous sphere of radius r p , ignoring higher order effects of polarization, can be approximated as (18)where E rms is the electric field strength, m is the permittivity of the suspending medium, is the angular frequency, and Re( f CM ()) is the real part of the dipolar Clausius-Mossotti (CM) factor. The CM factor is bound by the limits Ϫ0.5 Ͻ Re( f CM ()) Ͻ 1 and describes the relative polarization of the particle versus that of the surrounding medium given by f CM () ϭ (* p () Ϫ * m ())͞(* p () ϩ 2* m ()), where * p and * m are the complex permittivities of the particle and medium, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative potential mechanism for separation is dielectrophoresis (DEP), the translational motion of charge-neutral matter caused by polarization effects in nonuniform electric fields (15). Because of the relatively facile engineering of the electric fields and interface to integrated electronics, DEP provides an especially attractive force field for on-chip cell manipulation (16,17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both FE and SE use the angled DEP electrode geometry, which has been previously implemented by a number of groups including ours (24)(25)(26)(27). In this scheme, the electrodes operate in the negative DEP regime where the cells are physically repelled from areas of higher electric field gradients (i.e., near the electrode edges) into weaker field regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angled electrode structures have also been used as "funnels" to guide particle motion within a channel or as part of the function of a microsystem [55][56][57][58][59]. As DEP separators, angled electrode structures have been found favorable in their reliance on negative DEP for inducing forces of different strength on particles of different properties.…”
Section: Dielectrophoretic Separation Using Angled Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%