1976
DOI: 10.1002/cne.901660306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell growth in the lateral geniculate nucleus of kittens following the opening or closing of one eye

Abstract: Closing one eye of kittens at 23 days after birth resulted in paler Nissl staining of the deprived cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) that was detectable two days later. Differences between the two sides of the brain in mean cell area increased to a peak in binocular lamina A at 4--6 days after eyelid suture, and then fell to a trough at eight days before rising progressively to a higher level at 31 days. In lamina A1 the peak and trough were later. Opening one eye of kittens after 23 days of binocu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent work (Guillery & Stelzner, 1970) has shown that this morphological effect of monocular deprivation is largely confined to the binocular portion of the lateral geniculate nucleus; cell size in the monocular crescent of the deprived lamina is more nearly normal. Other recent work (Oursteler, Garey, & Movshon, 1976;Hickey, Spear, & Kratz, 1977;Movshon & Oursteler, 1976;Wan & Cragg, 1976) has confirmed and extended these findings concerning the effects of monocular deprivation on LGN cell size. In contrast, binocular deprivation (via either bilateral lid suture or dark rearing) produces only a transitory retardation in LGN cell growth, with neurons eventually achieving almost normal size (Guillery, 1973;Hickey et al, 1977;Kalil, 1978).…”
Section: Monocular and Binocular Deprivationsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Subsequent work (Guillery & Stelzner, 1970) has shown that this morphological effect of monocular deprivation is largely confined to the binocular portion of the lateral geniculate nucleus; cell size in the monocular crescent of the deprived lamina is more nearly normal. Other recent work (Oursteler, Garey, & Movshon, 1976;Hickey, Spear, & Kratz, 1977;Movshon & Oursteler, 1976;Wan & Cragg, 1976) has confirmed and extended these findings concerning the effects of monocular deprivation on LGN cell size. In contrast, binocular deprivation (via either bilateral lid suture or dark rearing) produces only a transitory retardation in LGN cell growth, with neurons eventually achieving almost normal size (Guillery, 1973;Hickey et al, 1977;Kalil, 1978).…”
Section: Monocular and Binocular Deprivationsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…It is more likely that the imbalance in visually-evoked activity, rather than the total input, is involved in mediating the eye-specific loss of neurofilament labeling; perhaps in the same way that it is thought to produce a change in cell size following monocular deprivatioñ Guillery, 1972;Cabelli et al, 1995;Riddle et al, 1995!. Results from this study are consistent with what is known of the cytological effects of monocular deprivation in the LGN, and raise the possibility that cytoskeleton alteration is involved in mediating these changes. Neurons in the LGN have been shown to respond rapidly to monocular deprivation, with the cross-sectional area of deprived somata being noticeably smaller than non-deprived somata after as little as 3-4 days of deprivation~Hubel & Wiesel, 1970;Wan & Cragg, 1976!. Deprivation also produces smaller axon terminals of corresponding LGN neurons, which exhibit marked transneuronal atrophy after 6 days of monocular lid suturẽ Antonini & Stryker, 1993!. Although currently not understood, the cellular events that permit these morphological changes should be found in brain regions spatially coincident with changes in cell structure, and ought to be evident at least during the initiation of structural modification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While shifts in ocularity in the visual cortex can be measured physiologically after 6 h of monocular deprivation~Mioche & Singer, 1989!, the accompanying gross structural changes of LGN neurons become evident only upon deprivation for 3-4 days Hubel & Wiesel, 1970;Wan & Cragg, 1976!. The physiological shift of ocular dominance induced by 24 h of monocular deprivation has been shown to overlap with the molecular "fingerprint" of long-term depression~LTD!~Heynen et al, 2003!.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6, June 1982 1980) or only being reflected in geniculate cell size after a delay of several weeks (Spear and Hickey, 1979;however, see Diirsteller et al, 1976). There is evidence here and elsewhere (for example, see Hubel and Wiesel, 1970;Wan and Cragg, 1976;LeVay et al, 1980) to show that 1 week of lid suture can result in quite obvious anatomical changes in the visual system, if the deprivation is begun early. However, the time of onset of the lid suture is a critical factor since short periods of deprivation are not as effective when begun late in the "critical period" (for example, see Blakemore and Van Sluyters, 1974;LeVay et al, 1980).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%